Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.

4 references·16 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1956The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.17,773 cited
1994The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.17,161 cited
1959Readings in Social Psychology.1,269 cited
1982Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior?141 cited

Cited by

1988The Empirical Study of the Persuasive Effects of Evidence The Status After Fifty Years of Research199 cited
1989Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The influence of jurors' preconceptions and witness behavior.132 cited
1990The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness.123 cited
1989The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury.119 cited
1987The Child in the Eyes of the Jury: Assessing Mock Jurors’ Perceptions of the Child Witness119 cited
2008A survey of people's attitudes and beliefs about false confessions112 cited
1989Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis101 cited
1983Silence is not golden.85 cited
1995The case for expert testimony about eyewitness memory.84 cited
2009Examining the “CSI-effect” in the cases of circumstantial evidence and eyewitness testimony: Multivariate and path analyses

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

76 cited

1987Children on the Witness Stand: A Communication/Persuasion Analysis of Jurors’ Reactions to Child Witnesses72 cited

2003Handbook of psychology in legal contexts72 cited

1989Determinants of the Child Victim’s Perceived Credibility72 cited

2002How effective are the cross-examination and expert testimony safeguards? Jurors' perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures.70 cited

1988Judge's Instruction on Eyewitness Testimony: Evaluation and Revision166 cited

1992The Psychology of Eyewitness Testimony: A Comparison of Experts and Prospective Jurors63 cited