SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparison of verbal preference assessments in the presence and absence of the actual stimuli
16 references·0 citing·24 second hop
Comparison of verbal preference assessments in the presence and absence of the actual stimuli (2005)Comparison of verbal preference assessmen…Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (2012)Expressive One-Word Picture V…PREDICTING THE RELATIVE EFFICACY OF THREE PRESENTATION METHODS FOR ASSESSING PREFERENCES OF PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES (2002)PREDICTING THE RELATIVE EFFIC…EVALUATING THE PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF A SINGLE STIMULUS ENGAGEMENT PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT (2001)EVALUATING THE PREDICTIVE VAL…A COMPARISON OF VERBAL AND TANGIBLE STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS (2000)A COMPARISON OF VERBAL AND TA…The effects of pictorial versus tangible stimuli in stimulus-preference assessments (1999)The effects of pictorial vers…EXAMINATION OF AMBIGUOUS STIMULUS PREFERENCES WITH DURATION‐BASED MEASURES (1999)EXAMINATION OF AMBIGUOUS STIM…ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITY PREFERENCES AS A FUNCTION OF DIFFERENTIAL CONSEQUENCES (1999)ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITY PREFEREN…EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT (1998)EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULU…DISPLACEMENT OF LEISURE REINFORCERS BY FOOD DURING PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS (1997)DISPLACEMENT OF LEISURE REINF…USING A CHOICE ASSESSMENT TO PREDICT REINFORCER EFFECTIVENESS (1996)USING A CHOICE ASSESSMENT TO …Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. (1996)Integrating caregiver report …EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES (1996)EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIM…A COMPARISON OF REINFORCER ASSESSMENT METHODS: THE UTILITY OF VERBAL AND PICTORIAL CHOICE PROCEDURES (1996)A COMPARISON OF REINFORCER AS…Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods (1994)Preference testing: A compari…A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES (1992)A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHE…ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS (1985)ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFER…IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH PROFOUND HANDICAPS: STAFF OPINION VERSUS SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF PREFERENCES (1988)AN ANALOGUE EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT: THE ROLE OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE (1997)Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. (1968)SOME CURRENT DIMENSIONS OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS1 (1968)REINFORCER VARIATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MOTIVATING DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN (1981)Tactics of Scientific Research: Evaluating Experimental Data in Psychology (1961)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (1988)Extrinsic Reinforcement in the Classroom: Bribery or Best Practice (2004)The Use of Dependent Group Contingencies to Increase On-Task Behavior in Two General Education Classrooms. (2006)ON THE LAW OF EFFECT 1 (1970)BASIC AND APPLIED RESEARCH ON CHOICE RESPONDING (1997)Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: a review of the literature (2004)Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application, (1966)DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN DISCRIMINATIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL FUNCTIONS OF STIMULI (1982)Further evaluation of the multiple-stimulus preference assessment (2000)Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: A review of the literature (2013)TREATMENT OF PICA THROUGH MULTIPLE ANALYSES OF ITS REINFORCING FUNCTIONS (1998)AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF MATCHED STIMULI ON BEHAVIORS MAINTAINED BY AUTOMATIC REINFORCEMENT (2000)EVALUATION OF A BRIEF MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT IN A NATURALISTIC CONTEXT (2000)Problem Behavior Interventions for Young Children with Autism: A Research Synthesis (2002)Stereotypy I: A review of behavioral assessment and treatment (2005)Dual coding theory and education (1991)Child Development and Emergent Literacy (1998)Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES1,701 cited
  • 1996EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES1,417 cited
  • 2012Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test970 cited
  • 1985ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS650 cited
  • 1998EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT470 cited
  • 1996Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.335 cited
  • 1996USING A CHOICE ASSESSMENT TO PREDICT REINFORCER EFFECTIVENESS237 cited
  • 1994Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods171 cited
  • 1996A COMPARISON OF REINFORCER ASSESSMENT METHODS: THE UTILITY OF VERBAL AND PICTORIAL CHOICE PROCEDURES136 cited
  • 1997DISPLACEMENT OF LEISURE REINFORCERS BY FOOD DURING PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS113 cited
  • 1999EXAMINATION OF AMBIGUOUS STIMULUS PREFERENCES WITH DURATION‐BASED MEASURES89 cited
  • 1999ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITY PREFERENCES AS A FUNCTION OF DIFFERENTIAL CONSEQUENCES86 cited
  • 2001EVALUATING THE PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF A SINGLE STIMULUS ENGAGEMENT PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT77 cited
  • 2002PREDICTING THE RELATIVE EFFICACY OF THREE PRESENTATION METHODS FOR ASSESSING PREFERENCES OF PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

62 cited
  • 1999The effects of pictorial versus tangible stimuli in stimulus-preference assessments50 cited
  • 2000A COMPARISON OF VERBAL AND TANGIBLE STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS42 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.