SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
THE POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF JUDICIAL REVIEW
3 references·3 citing·16 second hop
THE POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF JUDICIAL REVIEW (1996)THE POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONSEQUE…New directions in judicial review (1988)New directions in judicial re…JUDICIAL REVIEW: A WAY OF CONTROLLING GOVERNMENT? (1988)JUDICIAL REVIEW: A WAY OF CON…The Law Lords (1982)The Law LordsUnderstanding judicial review and its impact (2004)Understanding judicial review…Studying bureaucratic implementation of judicial policies in the United States: conceptual and methodological approaches (2004)Studying bureaucratic impleme…Conceptual issues in researching the impact of judicial review on government bureaucracies (2004)Conceptual issues in research…The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. (1948)Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (1981)Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms (1984)Rights, Regulation and Bureaucratic Impact: The Impact of Human Rights Litigation on the Regulation of Informal Trade in Johannesburg (2017)To Comply or Not to Comply, That Is the Question: The Street‐Level Implementation of Jurisprudence by Migration Officers (2025)Police and people in London (1985)WHAT IS HAPPENING TO APPLICATIONS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW? (1987)Judicial Review and Policy Making in Hong Kong: Changing Interface Between the Legal and the Political (2006)Judicial Review of Executive Power in the Singaporean Context, 1965–2012 (2016)Rights, 'Dialogue' and Democratic Objections to Judicial Review (2004)Judicial Review in Britain (1994)The politics of judicial discretion: Rethinking the interaction between national courts and the Eurpean court of justice (1996)The Commercial Appropriation of Personality (2002)Judicial Activism in England (1991)The Rise and Ruin of Unreasonableness? (2005)Protection of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Arbitration (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1982The Law Lords89 cited
  • 1988New directions in judicial review33 cited
  • 1988JUDICIAL REVIEW: A WAY OF CONTROLLING GOVERNMENT?25 cited

Cited by

  • 2004Conceptual issues in researching the impact of judicial review on government bureaucracies19 cited
  • 2004Understanding judicial review and its impact18 cited
  • 2004Studying bureaucratic implementation of judicial policies in the United States: conceptual and methodological approaches12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work