SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The miracle of DICE therapy for acute stroke: fact or fictional product of subgroup analysis?
3 references·16 citing·48 second hop
The miracle of DICE therapy for acute stroke: fact or fictional product of subgroup analysis? (1994)The miracle of DICE therapy for acute str…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials? (Transcript of an oral presentation, modified by the editors) (1987)Why do we need systematic ove…Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Publication bias: the case fo…Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta‐analyses) (2024)Papers that summarise other p…Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores (2015)Examining the Predictive Vali…Trial Registration (2013)Trial RegistrationThe Authors Say: ‘The Data Are Not So Robust because of Heterogeneity’ – So, How Should I Deal with This Systematic Review? (2011)The Authors Say: ‘The Data Ar…Improving the quality and reporting of systematic reviews⋆ (2010)Improving the quality and rep…Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research (2009)Evidence synthesis as the key…How useful are systematic reviews for informing palliative care practice? Survey of 25 Cochrane systematic reviews (2008)How useful are systematic rev…Exploring heterogeneity in meta‐analyses: needs, resources and challenges (2008)Exploring heterogeneity in me…Genomic Epidemiology of Complex Disease: The Need for an Electronic Evidence-based Approach to Research Synthesis (2005)Genomic Epidemiology of Compl…Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders? (2005)Can electronic monitoring red…All that glisters… How to assess the ‘value’ of a scientific paper (2005)All that glisters… How to ass…Doing New Research? Don't Forget the Old (2004)Doing New Research? Don't For…Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials (2002)Randomisation to protect agai…The Cochrane Collaboration in the 21st Century: Ten Challenges and One Reason Why They Must Be Met (2001)The Cochrane Collaboration in…Problems of using modelling in the economic evaluation of health care (1996)Problems of using modelling i…From Science to Practice (1995)From Science to PracticeThe file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research (2002)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)The Short-term Impact of Unconditional Cash Transfers to the Poor: Experimental Evidence from Kenya* (2016)The scandal of poor medical research (1994)Uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health care technologies: The role of sensitivity analysis (1994)Misleading meta-analysis (1995)Assessing the costs of healthcare technologies in clinical trials. (1999)Testing the Validity of Cost-Effectiveness Models (2000)The cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography for carotid artery stenosis and peripheral vascular disease: a systematic review (2002)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The Delphi List (1998)The Cochrane Library (2005)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. (1998)Systematic review and meta-analysis: a primer. (2012)Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing mindfulness-based programs for mental health promotion (2023)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The Cochrane Collaboration: Evaluation of Health Care and Services Using Systematic Reviews of the Results of Randomized Controlled Trials (1998)An increasing problem in publication ethics: Publication bias and editors’ role in avoiding it (2017)Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value (2020)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)The need to consider the wider agenda in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: breadth, timing, and depth of the evidence (2010)Graphical augmentations to the funnel plot assess the impact of additional evidence on a meta-analysis (2012)Trial sequential methods for meta‐analysis (2013)Effective Correctional Treatment: Bibliotherapy for Cynics (1979)A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of an Intensive Rehabilitation Supervision Program (2000)Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994 (2002)UNDER SURVEILLANCE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE EFFECTIVENESS AND CONSEQUENCES OF ELECTRONIC MONITORING (2006)Sex offender as homo sacer (2009)Creativity and effectiveness in the use of electronic monitoring: a case study of five European jurisdictions (2016)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Using Random Allocation to Evaluate Social Interventions: Three Recent U.K. Examples (2003)Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in coloproctology: interpretation and potential pitfalls (2007)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 7: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2009)Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: A critique (1991)Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials (1995)A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. (1997)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 1986Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.746 cited
  • 1987Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials? (Transcript of an oral presentation, modified by the editors)409 cited

Cited by

  • 2005Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders?179 cited
  • 1996Problems of using modelling in the economic evaluation of health care163 cited
  • 1995From Science to Practice108 cited
  • 2004Doing New Research? Don't Forget the Old101 cited
  • 2009Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research94 cited
  • 2002Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials63 cited
  • 2008How useful are systematic reviews for informing palliative care practice? Survey of 25 Cochrane systematic reviews61 cited
  • 2008Exploring heterogeneity in meta‐analyses: needs, resources and challenges38 cited
  • 2005Genomic Epidemiology of Complex Disease: The Need for an Electronic Evidence-based Approach to Research Synthesis33 cited
  • 2010Improving the quality and reporting of systematic reviews⋆31 cited
  • 2015Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores24 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2011The Authors Say: ‘The Data Are Not So Robust because of Heterogeneity’ – So, How Should I Deal with This Systematic Review?24 cited
  • 2005All that glisters… How to assess the ‘value’ of a scientific paper23 cited
  • 2024Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta‐analyses)20 cited
  • 2013Trial Registration18 cited
  • 2001The Cochrane Collaboration in the 21st Century: Ten Challenges and One Reason Why They Must Be Met18 cited