A Comparison of the Wrat and the Piat With Learning Disability Children

Dale D. Baum

11 citations0/0 files storedEducational and Psychological Measurement

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology Reading and Literacy Development Psychological Testing and Assessment

Abstract

This study was concerned with the comparative performance of learning disability children on the WRAT and the PIAT. Correlations between corresponding subtests of the two instruments were quite high for Reading and moderately high for Spelling and Arithmetic across four age levels (7 to 8, 9, 10, and 11 year olds). It was concluded that the utility of the PIAT is as promising as that of the WRAT, although diagnosticians using the PIAT may wish to exclude the Reading Comprehension subtest, as this subtest tends to be measuring the same skills as Reading Recognition at the lower grade levels.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

References

1972Concurrent Validity of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test

Cited by

1982Spelling Ability of Reading Disabled LD Students and Able Readers 1979A Comparison of PIAT and WRAT Performances of Learning Disabled Adolescents 1978The Peabody Individual Achievement Test with Normal and Special School Populations 1984Comparing the PIAT and Untimed CTBS in Obtaining Achievement Scores from Disturbed Children.1984Attention Deficit and Learning Disorders

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.