SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methodological quality of test accuracy studies included in systematic reviews in obstetrics and gynaecology: sources of bias
16 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Methodological quality of test accuracy studies included in systematic reviews in obstetrics and gynaecology: sources of bias (2011)Methodological quality of test accuracy s…A bibliometric analysis by geographic area of published research in several biomedical fields, 1995-2003 (2006)A bibliometric analysis by ge…How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis? (2005)How does study quality affect…Association between Compliance with Methodological Standards of Diagnostic Research and Reported Test Accuracy: Meta-Analysis of Focused Assessment of US for Trauma (2005)Association between Complianc…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)The diagnostic odds ratio: a …The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research (2002)Statistical methods for asses…Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature (2002)Reporting of measures of accu…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Does the inclusion of grey li…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Empirical Evidence of Design-…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (1998)CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to …An assessment of the use of the continuity correction for sparse data in meta-analysis (1996)An assessment of the use of t…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis (2011)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis (2015)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation (2004)Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research (2005)Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data (2006)Screening for Depression in Medical Settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis (2007)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Suicide Behavior (2007)Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study (2009)Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study (2017)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2003The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance2,260 cited
  • 1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests1,860 cited
  • 2000Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?811 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative703 cited
  • 2002Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research380 cited
  • 1998CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials241 cited
  • 1996An assessment of the use of the continuity correction for sparse data in meta-analysis123 cited
  • 2002Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

111 cited
  • 2005How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis?87 cited
  • 2005Association between Compliance with Methodological Standards of Diagnostic Research and Reported Test Accuracy: Meta-Analysis of Focused Assessment of US for Trauma74 cited
  • 2006A bibliometric analysis by geographic area of published research in several biomedical fields, 1995-200370 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.