SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Primer: an evidence-based approach to prognostic markers
11 references·5 citing·43 second hop
Primer: an evidence-based approach to prognostic markers (2005)Primer: an evidence-based approach to pro…Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (remark). (2006)Reporting recommendations for…The strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate data (2005)The strengths and limitations…Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor Studies (2005)Selective Reporting Biases in…Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the future (2003)Reporting of prognostic marke…To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)To IPD or not to IPD?Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables (2001)Systematic reviews of evaluat…Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Systematic Reviews in Health …Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health …Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology (1999)Traditional reviews, meta-ana…Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. (1998)Systematic reviews of trials …Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data (1995)Practical methodology of meta…Systematic Reviews of Prognostic Factor Studies (2022)Systematic Reviews of Prognos…Doug Altman: Driving critical appraisal and improvements in the quality of methodological and medical research (2020)Doug Altman: Driving critical…Multivariate meta‐analysis of prognostic factor studies with multiple cut‐points and/or methods of measurement (2015)Multivariate meta‐analysis of…Chapter 12: Systematic Review of Prognostic Tests (2012)Chapter 12: Systematic Review…Letter to the Editor (2007)Letter to the EditorExtracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Meta‐Analysis in Medical Research (2005)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies (2019)Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research (2000)Prognostic markers in cancer: the evolution of evidence from single studies to meta-analysis, and beyond (2009)Ten steps towards improving prognosis research (2009)Evaluating the Quality of Research into a Single Prognostic Biomarker: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 83 Studies of C-Reactive Protein in Stable Coronary Artery Disease (2010)Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials (2009)Dose-response meta-analysis of differences in means (2016)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice (2005)Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment. (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (2000)Long-term mental health of war-refugees: a systematic literature review (2015)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results (2007)Methods for meta-analysis in genetic association studies: a review of their potential and pitfalls (2007)Mejorar la comunicación de estudios observacionales en epidemiología (STROBE): explicación y elaboración (2009)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression (2009)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3 (2013)Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. (2019)Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field (2005)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. (2001)Collaborative care for depression in primary care (2006)A meta-analysis of randomized trials of behavioural treatment of depression (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
  • 2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care1,692 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables757 cited
  • 1999Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology594 cited
  • 2002To IPD or not to IPD?571 cited
  • 1995Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data492 cited
  • 2005The strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate data250 cited
  • 1998Systematic reviews of trials and other studies.246 cited
  • 2005Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor Studies231 cited
  • 2003Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the future166 cited
  • 2006Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (remark).148 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Letter to the Editor70 cited
  • 2015Multivariate meta‐analysis of prognostic factor studies with multiple cut‐points and/or methods of measurement40 cited
  • 2012Chapter 12: Systematic Review of Prognostic Tests37 cited
  • 2020Doug Altman: Driving critical appraisal and improvements in the quality of methodological and medical research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

17 cited
  • 2022Systematic Reviews of Prognostic Factor Studies8 cited