Comparison of Management Faculty Perspectives on Quizzing and Its Alternatives

Paul Bacdayan

8 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Education for Business

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Management and Marketing Education Evaluation of Teaching Practices Innovative Teaching Methods

Abstract

In this study, the author compares the views of faculty members who give quizzes and those who do not regarding (a) the potential drawbacks of quizzing and (b) the viability of various quiz alternatives such as graded homework. The results suggest that quizzers and nonquizzers have much in common and that quizzing is simply one of a variety of potentially effective techniques for boosting student preparation. The author also presents data on typical quiz practices.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

1971Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.1975On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B.1988Reasons for Studying: Motivational Orientations and Study Strategies 2001Encouraging Participation in Case Discussions: A Comparison of the Mica and the Harvard Case Methods 1984The missing connection between business and the universities 1994The effects of frequent testing in an income tax course: An experiment 1997Increasing Student Participation in Case Discussions: Using the MICA Method in Strategic Management Courses 1997Evaluating Instructors' Perceptions of Students' Preparation for Management Curricula

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.