SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
12 references·1 citing·35 second hop
Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. (2003)Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addre…The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)The STARD Statement for Repor…Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Value of Flow Diagrams in Rep…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Empirical Evidence of Design-…Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1997)Uniform Requirements for Manu…The CONSORT Statement (1996)The CONSORT StatementImproving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good (1995)Use of methodological standar…Disease, Level of Impact, and Quality of Research Methods (1992)Disease, Level of Impact, and…A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. (1986)A framework for clinical eval…How to Critically Appraise the Clinical Literature (2014)How to Critically Appraise th…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) (2005)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions. (2009)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis (2011)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis (2015)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT Revised—Improving the Reporting of Randomized Trials (2001)A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (2004)The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study (2009)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Pooling of Animal Experimental Data Reveals Influence of Study Design and Publication Bias (2004)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research (2015)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data (2002)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests1,860 cited
  • 2003The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration1,124 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 1996The CONSORT Statement736 cited
  • 1995Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good711 cited
  • 2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials316 cited
  • 1997Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals243 cited
  • 1986A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies.195 cited
  • 1992Disease, Level of Impact, and Quality of Research Methods105 cited

Cited by

  • 2014How to Critically Appraise the Clinical Literature15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work