SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence-Based Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
11 references·7 citing·39 second hop
Evidence-Based Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2008)Evidence-Based Oral and Maxillofacial Sur…Quality of Reporting of Cancer Prognostic Marker Studies: Association With Reported Prognostic Effect (2007)Quality of Reporting of Cance…Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results (2007)Almost all articles on cancer…Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the "5S" evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions (2006)Of studies, syntheses, synops…Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor Studies (2005)Selective Reporting Biases in…REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) (2005)REporting recommendations for…Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) (2005)Reporting Recommendations for…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Comparison of Evidence of Tre…Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Randomized, Controlled Trials…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Summing up evidence: one answ…Levels of evidence and journal impact factor in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a 15-year follow-up (2020)Levels of evidence and journa…Open Access Publishing: A Study of Current Practice in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Research (2016)Open Access Publishing: A Stu…Risk of bias in research in oral and maxillofacial surgery (2013)Risk of bias in research in o…The impact of case reports in oral and maxillofacial surgery (2012)The impact of case reports in…The evidence base for oral and maxillofacial surgery: 10-year analysis of two journals (2010)The evidence base for oral an…Evidence-based burn care—An assessment of the methodological quality of research published in burn care journals from 1982 to 2008 (2010)Evidence-based burn care—An a…Publish or perish? A survey of abstracts accepted for meetings of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, and subsequently published (2009)Publish or perish? A survey o…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. (2009)Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data (2009)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement (2015)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature (2007)Publication of Tumor Marker Research Results: The Necessity for Complete and Transparent Reporting (2012)Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis for a Binary Outcome: One-Stage or Two-Stage? (2013)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Methods for meta-analysis in genetic association studies: a review of their potential and pitfalls (2007)Mejorar la comunicación de estudios observacionales en epidemiología (STROBE): explicación y elaboración (2009)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Appraising the Quality of Medical Education Research Methods (2015)Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Evidence-based medicine, the essential role of systematic reviews, and the need for automated text mining tools (2010)Sensitivity and Predictive Value of 15 PubMed Search Strategies to Answer Clinical Questions Rated Against Full Systematic Reviews (2012)Studying the potential impact of automated document classification on scheduling a systematic review update (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
  • 2005Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)2,148 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2001Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies919 cited
  • 1998Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough655 cited
  • 2005REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)312 cited
  • 2007Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results231 cited
  • 2005Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor Studies231 cited
  • 2006Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the "5S" evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions151 cited
  • 2007Quality of Reporting of Cancer Prognostic Marker Studies: Association With Reported Prognostic Effect94 cited

Cited by

  • 2009Publish or perish? A survey of abstracts accepted for meetings of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, and subsequently published35 cited
  • 2010Evidence-based burn care—An assessment of the methodological quality of research published in burn care journals from 1982 to 2008

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

29 cited
  • 2012The impact of case reports in oral and maxillofacial surgery26 cited
  • 2010The evidence base for oral and maxillofacial surgery: 10-year analysis of two journals26 cited
  • 2016Open Access Publishing: A Study of Current Practice in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Research15 cited
  • 2020Levels of evidence and journal impact factor in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a 15-year follow-up15 cited
  • 2013Risk of bias in research in oral and maxillofacial surgery14 cited