SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Review of the Types of Scientific Misconduct in Biomedical Research
16 references·4 citing·36 second hop
A Review of the Types of Scientific Misconduct in Biomedical Research (2008)A Review of the Types of Scientific Misco…A tale of two citations (2008)A tale of two citationsThe Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The Increasing Dominance of T…The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism (2005)The White Bull effect: abusiv…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Scientists behaving badlyUnethical practices in authorship of scientific papers (2003)Unethical practices in author…US and Non-US Submissions (1998)US and Non-US SubmissionsPeer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1 (1998)Peer Review for Journals as i…HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Nepotism and sexism in peer-r…The scandal of poor medical research (1994)The scandal of poor medical r…Evaluating the Quality of Articles Published in Journal Supplements Compared With the Quality of Those Published in the Parent Journal (1994)Evaluating the Quality of Art…Data Torturing (1993)Data TorturingCitation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Citation Indexing-Its Theory …The sociology of science (1973)The sociology of sciencePatterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity (1968)Patterns of Name Ordering Amo…Black's Law Dictionary (1891)Black's Law DictionaryResearch funding randomly allocated? A survey of scientists’ views on peer review and lottery (2021)Research funding randomly all…Perceptions and Attitudes about Research Integrity and Misconduct: a Survey among Young Biomedical Researchers in Italy (2020)Perceptions and Attitudes abo…Rewarding the quantity of peer review could harm biomedical research (2019)Rewarding the quantity of pee…Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented Theory of Planned Behavior (2015)Predicting self-reported rese…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Market value and patent citations (2005)Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups (2010)Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century (2012)The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market* (2017)Strong Inference (1964)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1978)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)Scientific Utopia (2012)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Advances in Fingerprint Technology (2001)The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy And Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective (2005)Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019)Educational Research, Policymaking and Practice (2002)The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews (2013)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)Sensitivity and Attachment: A Meta-Analysis on Parental Antecedents of Infant Attachment (1997)Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Explaining Creativity: The Attributional Perspective (1995)Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies (2000)Top-cited Articles in Chemical Engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded: A Bibliometric Analysis (2012)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences (2003)The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics (2007)Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (1993)What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge (1998)Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge3,605 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,988 cited
  • 1980Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities1,640 cited
  • 1973The sociology of science1,637 cited
  • 1997Nepotism and sexism in peer-review1,346 cited
  • 1891Black's Law Dictionary1,255 cited
  • 2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
  • 1994The scandal of poor medical research897 cited
  • 1998US and Non-US Submissions318 cited
  • 1968Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity242 cited
  • 2003Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers216 cited
  • 1998Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1195 cited
  • 1993Data Torturing181 cited
  • 2008A tale of two citations175 cited
  • 2005The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism171 cited
  • 1994Evaluating the Quality of Articles Published in Journal Supplements Compared With the Quality of Those Published in the Parent Journal

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

153 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented Theory of Planned Behavior39 cited
  • 2021Research funding randomly allocated? A survey of scientists’ views on peer review and lottery23 cited
  • 2020Perceptions and Attitudes about Research Integrity and Misconduct: a Survey among Young Biomedical Researchers in Italy19 cited
  • 2019Rewarding the quantity of peer review could harm biomedical research16 cited