Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers

14 references·16 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2008Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis1,159 cited
2000Consequences of Reducing Nonresponse in a National Telephone Survey986 cited
1997When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable566 cited
2011Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey477 cited
1997When Authorship Fails401 cited
2011A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines394 cited
1997The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty242 cited
2011Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies134 cited
2009Recognition, reward and responsibility: Why the authorship of scientific papers matters115 cited
2012Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors84 cited
2005Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings83 cited
2013Scientific dishonesty—a nationwide survey of doctoral students in Norway71 cited
1999Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries69 cited
2012Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

55 cited

Cited by

2017Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications55 cited
2022An Ethical Exploration of Increased Average Number of Authors Per Publication50 cited
2021Using scientific authorship criteria as a tool for equitable inclusion in global health research47 cited
2020Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China41 cited
2018Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration40 cited
2015Scientific Dishonesty37 cited
2018Understanding of International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Authorship Criteria Among Faculty Members of Pharmacy and Other Health Sciences in Jordan33 cited
2018Definition of authorship in social science journals28 cited
2023Misconduct in biomedical research: A meta-analysis and systematic review27 cited
2018Academic and Scientific Authorship Practices: A Survey Among South African Researchers26 cited
2020No room for ambiguity24 cited
2021How to Handle Co-authorship When Not Everyone’s Research Contributions Make It into the Paper22 cited
2021A new method of co-author credit allocation based on contributor roles taxonomy: proof of concept and evaluation using papers published in PLOS ONE20 cited
2019Transparent Attribution of Contributions to Research: Aligning Guidelines to Real-Life Practices19 cited
2017Knowledge of scientific misconduct in publication among medical students16 cited
2017All for one or one for all? Authorship and the cross-sectoral valuation of credit in nutrition science10 cited