Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The quality of written peer feedback on undergraduates’ draft answers to an assignment, and the use made of the feedback

16 references·2 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2006Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment1,035 cited
2013Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective967 cited
2002The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning794 cited
2009Peer Assessment784 cited
2006Innovative Assessment in Higher Education535 cited
2001Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views517 cited
1995Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment491 cited
2009Student revision with peer and expert reviewing457 cited
2011Feedback: focusing attention on engagement442 cited
2009Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback374 cited
2009Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?361 cited
2010Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work335 cited
2010Peer reviewers learn from giving comments294 cited
2007‘Feed‐forward’: improving students' use of tutors' comments272 cited
2011Learning by reviewing.248 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2007Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work216 cited

Cited by

2014Inferring mindful cognitive‐processing of peer‐feedback via eye‐tracking: role of feedback‐characteristics, fixation‐durations and transitions57 cited
2021Supporting Peer Feedback on Learning Strategies: Effects on Self-Efficacy and Feedback Quality56 cited