this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
- 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
- 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
- 2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
- 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
- 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
- 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
- 2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care1,692 cited
- 2002Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.1,363 cited
- 2007The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey1,048 cited
- 2001Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies919 cited
- 2002Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.880 cited
- 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
- 1998Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work