An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers

Nisha Nair · Neharika Vohra

238 citations0/0 files storedManagement Decision

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Employee Performance and Management Workplace Health and Well-being

Abstract

Purpose There is limited research on the work alienation of knowledge workers in management studies. This paper seeks to address this gap by exploring the extent and reasons for the alienation of knowledge workers. Design/methodology/approach In the absence of a comprehensive framework for understanding the work alienation of knowledge workers, various factors such as structural elements of centralization and formalization, work characteristics of autonomy, variety, creativity, meaningfulness and self‐expressiveness, quality of work relationships and justice perceptions were examined as predictors of work alienation. Survey data were collected from six different organizations in the information technology sector ( n =1,142) in India. Findings Around 20 percent of the sample was found to be alienated from work. The strongest predictors of work alienation for knowledge workers were found to be lack of meaningful work, inability of work to allow for self‐expression, and poor quality work relationships. Research limitations/implications Organizations employing knowledge workers cannot risk alienating them. The study indicates that one in every five knowledge workers is likely to be alienated. For organizations and practitioners this is a wake up call, pointing to the urgent need to try and understand the factors that are likely to cause alienation among knowledge workers and take adequate preventive steps to ensure an enthused workforce. Originality/value Research on alienation in present times has been somewhat limited. This is the first research of its kind across knowledge workers in the information technology industry that attempts to capture their work alienation and factors predicting it.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 238 citations exist upstream.

References

1989Structural Equations with Latent Variables 1991Structural Equations with Latent Variables.1996Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm 2003Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures 1995Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective 1975Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.1996ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.2001On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure.

Cited by

2013Mediator Analysis of Employee Engagement: Role of Perceived Organizational Support, P-O Fit, Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction 2009Developing a New Measure of Work Alienation 2018The Effect of Fairness, Responsible Leadership and Worthy Work on Multiple Dimensions of Meaningful Work 2012Alienation from work: Marxist ideologies and twenty-first-century practice 2017The relationship between learning culture, inquiry and dialogue, knowledge sharing structure and affective commitment to change

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.