Rethinking Age Dependence in Organizational Mortality: Logical Fromalizations

Abstract

This article explores the use of logical formalization to clarify an area of research characterized by conflicting claims and divergent empirical findings. The substantive focus concerns the relation between organization age and the hazard of mortality. The literature contains claims that the hazard (a) falls with age (a “liability of newness”), (b) rises initially and then falls with age (a “liability of adolescence”), (c) rises with age (“liabilities of senescence and obsolescense”). The formalizations reported cast the relevant theoretical arguments as propositions involving five concepts: endowment, imprinting, inertia, capability, and position. It shows that each of the theoretical stories can be derived as implications of particular assumptions within two broad formalizations. This analysis clarifies the mechanizms at work in each theoretical account and provides guidance for expirical research designed to discriminate among the competing theories.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 308 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.