Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation

Abstract

Examination of motivational dynamics in academic contexts within self-determination theory has centered primarily around both the motives (initially intrinsic vs. extrinsic, later autonomous vs. controlled) that regulate learners' study behavior and the contexts that promote or hinder these regulations. Less attention has been paid to the goal contents (intrinsic vs. extrinsic) that learners hold and to the different goal contents that are communicated in schools to increase the perceived relevance of the learning. Recent field experiments are reviewed showing that intrinsic goal framing (relative to extrinsic goal framing and no-goal framing) produces deeper engagement in learning activities, better conceptual learning, and higher persistence at learning activities. These effects occur for both intrinsically and extrinsically oriented individuals. Results are discussed in terms of self-determination theory's concept of basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness.

Cite this

Maarten Vansteenkiste, Willy Lens, Edward L. Deci (2006). Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4

@article{maarten2006intrinsic,
  title  = {Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation},
  author = {Vansteenkiste, Maarten and Lens, Willy and Deci, Edward L.},
  year   = {2006},
  journal = {Educational Psychologist},
  doi    = {10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,791 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by