SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence-based diagnosis
14 references·1 citing·43 second hop
Evidence-based diagnosis (2008)Evidence-based diagnosisGraphical presentation of diagnostic information (2008)Graphical presentation of dia…Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies (2007)Systematic reviews of test ac…Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool …A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)A unification of models for m…No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies (2005)No role for quality scores in…Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Bivariate analysis of sensiti…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)The STARD statement for repor…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations (2001)A hierarchical regression app…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Empirical Evidence of Design-…Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy (1995)Meta-analytic methods for dia…Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests (1994)Guidelines for Meta-analyses …Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy from Multiple Conflicting Reports (1993)Estimating Diagnostic Accurac…Survey of the methods and reporting practices in published meta‐analyses of test performance: 1987 to 2009 (2013)Survey of the methods and rep…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Diagnostic accuracy of the mood module of the Patient Health Questionnaire: a systematic review (2007)Screening for Depression in the General Population with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D): A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis (2016)GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy (2020)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis (2011)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis (2015)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation (2004)Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research (2005)Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations (1993)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data (2002)Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis Techniques in the Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests (2004)Some Statistical Methods for Combining Experimental Results (1990)Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests (2002)A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy (2005)The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition) (2009)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2011)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Simulation Run Length Control in the Presence of an Initial Transient (1983)Item Response Theory (1985)Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data (2006)Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews3,362 cited
  • 1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests1,860 cited
  • 2001A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations1,509 cited
  • 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration1,214 cited
  • 2006Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies769 cited
  • 1994Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests754 cited
  • 2006A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies752 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative703 cited
  • 1995Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy467 cited
  • 1993Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy from Multiple Conflicting Reports434 cited
  • 2005No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies337 cited
  • 2007Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies112 cited
  • 2008Graphical presentation of diagnostic information

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

61 cited

Cited by

  • 2013Survey of the methods and reporting practices in published meta‐analyses of test performance: 1987 to 200910 cited