Improving publication quality by reducing bias with double-blind reviewing and author response

Abstract

Because scientific progress depends on peer-reviewing, it behooves researchers to ensure that evaluations are as error free as possible and of the highest possible quality. However, scientists are human and humans have emotions and biases. The reviewing process

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.