SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion Association of Forensic Science Providers
0 references·10 citing·32 second hop
Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion Association of Forensic Science Providers (2010)Standards for the formulation of evaluati…The logic of forensic pathology opinion (2022)The logic of forensic patholo…Opinion evidence in cell site analysis (2020)Opinion evidence in cell site…On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al. (2014)On the use of the likelihood …Appraisal of scientific evidence in criminal justice systems: on winds of change and coexisting formats (2014)Appraisal of scientific evide…Use of data to inform expert evaluative opinion in the comparison of hand images—the importance of scars (2013)Use of data to inform expert …The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions (2013)The psychology of interpretin…How to assign a likelihood ratio in a footwear mark case: an analysis and discussion in the light of R v T (2012)How to assign a likelihood ra…E-learning initiatives in forensic interpretation: Report on experiences from current projects and outlook (2012)E-learning initiatives in for…Forensic Science Evidence in Question (2011)Forensic Science Evidence in …Complexity in Forensic Science (2010)Complexity in Forensic ScienceStatistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (1996)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Quality-Control Handbook. (1952)On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B. (1975)Competitive Advantage Through People (1994)Forensic Science and the Paradigm of Quality (2013)Towards a forensic semiotics (2024)A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework (1998)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (2004)Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)Probability Information in Risk Communication: A Review of the Research Literature (2008)Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2009)Cognitive neuroscience in forensic science: understanding and utilizing the human element (2015)Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence (2015)Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners (2016)A model for case assessment and interpretation (1998)Post-mortem to ante-mortem facial image comparison for deceased migrant identification (2024)The potential of facial nevi in personal identification (2024)From traditional to innovative: implications of cranial non-metric traits in personal identification (2025)Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion (2009)Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T (2011)An introduction to a debate (2012)Admissibility and appraisal of scientific evidence in continental European criminal justice systems: past, present and future (2013)Forays into disability discrimination legislation and wearable computing (2014)Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (1995)Cell site analysis: Changes to networks with time (2022)Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias (2020)Lead isotope ratios for bullets, forensic evaluation in a Bayesian paradigm (2015)Calculation of likelihood ratios for gunshot residue evidence—statistical aspects (2016)On the Bayesian approach to forensic age estimation of living individuals (2017)A response to “Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look” by Lund and Iyer (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2013The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions28 cited
  • 2011Forensic Science Evidence in Question26 cited
  • 2022The logic of forensic pathology opinion22 cited
  • 2012E-learning initiatives in forensic interpretation: Report on experiences from current projects and outlook19 cited
  • 2012How to assign a likelihood ratio in a footwear mark case: an analysis and discussion in the light of R v T18 cited
  • 2013Use of data to inform expert evaluative opinion in the comparison of hand images—the importance of scars18 cited
  • 2010Complexity in Forensic Science16 cited
  • 2014On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al.15 cited
  • 2020Opinion evidence in cell site analysis11 cited
  • 2014Appraisal of scientific evidence in criminal justice systems: on winds of change and coexisting formats9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work