Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How a “Reasonable Doubt” Instruction Affects Decisions of Guilt

14 references·16 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1977Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.11,315 cited
1992Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.761 cited
1999Stimulus Sampling and Social Psychological Experimentation686 cited
1991Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment.561 cited
2001Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups.525 cited
1976Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors.182 cited
1996The Difference between Blackstone-Like Error Ratios and Probabilistic Standards of Proof110 cited
1991“Beyond Reasonable” Doubt and “Probable Cause”110 cited
1985Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof.82 cited
1994Inside the Juror: The Psychology of Juror Decision Making82 cited
1990Defining the Standard of Proof in Jury Instructions71 cited
1996A concept in search of a definition: The effects of reasonable doubt instructions on certainty of guilt standards and jury verdicts.52 cited
2002Do juries meet our expectations?48 cited
2018People, materials, and situations5 cited

Cited by

2012

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Observing Court Responses to Victims of Rape and Sexual Assault

73 cited

2017Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: How simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors’ application of instructions.38 cited

20105 Judges as Members of Small Groups36 cited

20107 Is There a Psychology of Judging?36 cited

20101 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry29 cited

20103 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning22 cited

2013Regaining Fans’ Trust after Negative Incidents: Fit between Responses and Nature of Incidents21 cited

2013The Probability of Guilt in Criminal Cases: Are People Aware of Being ‘Beyond Reasonable Doubt’?19 cited

20102 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging17 cited

2013Predicting verdicts using pre‐trial attitudes and standard of proof17 cited

201010 Judges, Expertise, and Analogy16 cited

2010Statistical techniques for juror and jury research13 cited

20109 In Praise of Pedantic Eclecticism: Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Psychology of Judging11 cited

2021Greater Knowledge Enhances Complainant Credibility and Increases Jury Convictions for Child Sexual Assault10 cited

2012The Roles of Shared Stereotypes and Shared Processing Goals on Mock Jury Decision Making10 cited

2013Effects of the “intimate conviction” instruction on the processing of judicial information8 cited