Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects?

16 references·16 citing·40 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1981An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings.4,887 cited
1971Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.2,947 cited
1984Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access.1,420 cited
1973The American Heritage Word Frequency Book1,379 cited
1984Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.1,270 cited
1975Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words1,071 cited
1979Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect588 cited
1976Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words534 cited
1985Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading323 cited
1970The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process303 cited
1979Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS)286 cited
1985Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming270 cited
1974Word recognition and morphemic structure.250 cited
1982Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

246 cited

1977The processing of affixed words242 cited

1981Prefix stripping revisited211 cited

Cited by

1992The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined144 cited
1994Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon142 cited
2011Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds139 cited
1990Naming multisyllabic words.139 cited
2004Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a “hat” in “that”?133 cited
2000Complex Compounds in German: Interword Spaces Facilitate Segmentation but Hinder Assignment of Meaning112 cited
1994The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective103 cited
1999Lexical Access Routes to Nouns in a Morphologically Rich Language100 cited
2013Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary100 cited
2014A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience97 cited
1989Priming homographic stems97 cited
1997Words and Morphemes as Units for Lexical Access89 cited
2012The development of word recognition and its significance for comprehension and fluency.82 cited
2007The influence of semantic transparency on eye movements during English compound word recognition81 cited
2008The processing of compound words in English: Effects of word length on eye movements during reading78 cited
1996Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks68 cited