Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study

16 references·16 citing·36 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
2011Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials7,681 cited
1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
2008Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry2,046 cited
2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
2002Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.1,363 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited

2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited

2008Addressing Reporting Biases651 cited

Cited by

2016The treatment of chronic depression with cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized‐controlled clinical trials126 cited
2023Do cash transfers alleviate common mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review and meta-analysis64 cited
2016Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses52 cited
2016Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of “Instructions for Authors”51 cited
2021Neglect of publication bias compromises meta-analyses of educational research49 cited
2017Effect Comparison between Egger’s Test and Begg’s Test in Publication Bias Diagnosis in Meta-Analyses: Evidence from a Pilot Survey46 cited
2016Statistical controversies in clinical research: publication bias evaluations are not routinely conducted in clinical oncology systematic reviews44 cited
2016Risk of bias and methodological appraisal practices in systematic reviews published in anaesthetic journals: a meta‐epidemiological study40 cited
2017Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder26 cited
2019An Evaluation of Publication Bias in High-Impact Orthopaedic Literature26 cited
2016Utilization of Clinical Trials Registries in Obstetrics and Gynecology Systematic Reviews22 cited
2024Yet another problem with systematic reviews: a living review update20 cited
2016State-of-the-Art Reporting20 cited
2021Quality Assessment of Published Systematic Reviews in High Impact Cardiology Journals: Revisiting the Evidence Pyramid20 cited
2017Requirements for trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines in critical care journals20 cited
2016Assessment of publication bias required improvement in oral health systematic reviews18 cited