Mapping the dynamics of overall equipment effectiveness to enhance asset management practices

Abstract

Purpose The importance of physical assets has been increasingly recognized in recent decades. The significant returns on small improvements in overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) justify investment in the management of physical assets, but the wide variation of OEE across firms raises a question: “Why do these differences persist despite a high return on investments to maximize OEE?”. To address this question the dynamic processes that control the evolution of OEE through time need to be better understood. This paper aims to answer this question. Design/methodology/approach Building on insights from system dynamics and strategy literature, the paper maps the reinforcing feedback loops governing the maintenance function and its interactions with various elements in a firm. Building on strategy literature it hypothesizes that these loops can explain wide variations in observed persistent variations in OEE among otherwise similar firms. The paper draws on previous literature, extensive case studies and consulting projects to provide such mapping using the qualitative mapping tools from system dynamics. Findings The research outlines several reinforcing loops; once active, any of them could lead a firm towards a problematic mode of operation where reactive maintenance, poor morale, and a culture of fire‐fighting dominate. Actions taken to fix problems in the short‐run often activate vicious cycles, erode the capability of the organization over the long run, and lead to a lower OEE. Social implications Knowing the factors affecting the asset management function of a plant increases the plant's safety and limits its environmental hazards. Originality/value Some of the common dynamics of organizations' asset management practices are illustrated and modeled. The strategic importance of OEE and its effect on companies' market capitalization is demonstrated.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 78 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.