Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reporting Bias in Diagnostic and Prognostic Studies: Time for Action

8 references·16 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
2005The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed2,906 cited
2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results853 cited
2001Publication and Related Biases465 cited
2007Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results231 cited
2007Quality of Reporting of Cancer Prognostic Marker Studies: Association With Reported Prognostic Effect94 cited
2007Reporting research results: A moral obligation for all researchers60 cited

Cited by

2022STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration48 cited
2014Publication and Reporting of Test Accuracy Studies Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov47 cited
2014Importance of Transparent Reporting of Health Research43 cited
2014Application of credibility ceilings probes the robustness of meta-analyses of biomarkers and cancer risk42 cited
2015Multivariate meta‐analysis of prognostic factor studies with multiple cut‐points and/or methods of measurement40 cited
2014The Time Has Come to Register Diagnostic and Prognostic Research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

39 cited

2018Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review36 cited

2017Facilitating Prospective Registration of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A STARD Initiative36 cited

2010Beyond publication bias35 cited

2023Searching for and selecting studies29 cited

2014Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports27 cited

2022Structured reporting to improve transparency of analyses in prognostic marker studies27 cited

2013Overview of data-synthesis in systematic reviews of studies on outcome prediction models26 cited

2020Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy23 cited

2016Time to publication among completed diagnostic accuracy studies: associated with reported accuracy estimates20 cited

2020Doug Altman: Driving critical appraisal and improvements in the quality of methodological and medical research17 cited