Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices

Nam‐Hwa Kang · Carolyn S. Wallace

291 citations0/0 files storedScience Education

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Science Education and Pedagogy Educational Strategies and Epistemologies Science Education and Perceptions

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore how science teachers' epistemological beliefs and teaching goals are related to their use of lab activities. Research questions include (a) What are the teachers' epistemological beliefs pertaining to lab activities? (b) Why do the science teachers use lab activities? (c) How are the teachers' epistemological beliefs and instructional goals related to teaching actions? Two major aspects of epistemologies guided this study: ontological aspect (certainty/diversity of truth) and relational aspect (relationship between the knower and the known). The ontological aspect addresses whether one views knowledge as one certain truth or as tentative multiple truths. The relational aspect addresses whether one views him/herself as a receiver of prescribed knowledge separating self from knowledge construction or as an active meaning maker connecting self to the knowledge construction processes. More sophisticated epistemological beliefs include the acknowledgement of multiple interpretations of the same phenomena and active role of the knower in knowledge construction. Three experienced secondary science teachers were interviewed and observed throughout an academic course. The findings illustrate that a teacher's naïve epistemological beliefs are clearly reflected in the teacher's teaching practices. However, a teacher's sophisticated epistemological beliefs are not always clearly connected to the practice. This seems to be related to the necessary negotiation among their epistemological beliefs, teaching contexts, and instructional goals. Ontological and relational beliefs seem to be connected to different facets of teaching practices. Findings indicate that various syntheses of different aspects of epistemological beliefs and instructional goals are linked to teachers' diverse ways of using lab activities. Implications for research and teacher education are discussed. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 89:140–165, 2005

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 291 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook 1992Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.1990Qualitative evaluation and research methods 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1993Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques 1986Handbook of research on teaching 1971Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method.1995National Science Education Standards

Cited by

2007Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer‐mediated classroom lessons 2007The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of inquiry teaching practices 2019A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea 2016Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms 2006Multiple Epistemological Coherences in an Eighth-Grade Discussion of the Rock Cycle

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.