SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Post‐publication filtering and evaluation: Faculty of 1000
0 references·14 citing·50 second hop
Post‐publication filtering and evaluation: Faculty of 1000 (2003)Post‐publication filtering and evaluation…Biomedical publishing: Past historic, present continuous, future conditional (2023)Biomedical publishing: Past h…Lung cancer research and its citation on clinical practice guidelines (2021)Lung cancer research and its …Bringing the review process into the 21st century: Post-publication peer review (2020)Bringing the review process i…How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators (2019)How well does I3 perform for …F1000Prime recommended articles and their citations: an exploratory study of four journals (2019)F1000Prime recommended articl…Association Between Twitter Reception at a National Urology Conference and Future Publication Status (2019)Association Between Twitter R…Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research (2015)Usefulness of altmetrics for …The effects of research level and article type on the differences between citation metrics and F 1000 recommendations (2015)The effects of research level…Open Access Publishing: A Literature Review (2015)Open Access Publishing: A Lit…Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F 1000 P rime peer review (2015)Interrater reliability and co…F1000Prime: an analysis of discipline-specific reader data from Mendeley (2015)F1000Prime: an analysis of di…Altmetrics (Chapter from Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact) (2015)Altmetrics (Chapter from Beyo…Peer review in a rapidly evolving publishing landscape (2012)Peer review in a rapidly evol…Publications as a measure of scientific advancement and of scientists' productivity (2005)Publications as a measure of …Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship (1984)What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey (2012)Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics (2014)Context of altmetrics data matters: an investigation of count type and user category (2017)Altmetrics data providers: A meta-analysis review of the coverage of metrics and publication (2020)What is the societal impact of university research? A policy-oriented review to map approaches, identify monitoring methods and success factors (2022)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Sleeping Beauties in science (2004)Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)A construction and empirical research of the journal disruption index based on open citation data (2023)Evaluation and Comparison of Academic Impact and Disruptive Innovation Level of Medical Journals: Bibliometric Analysis and Disruptive Evaluation (2024)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. (1981)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): An empirical attempt to study a new field‐normalized bibliometric indicator (2016)What are we measuring? Refocusing on some fundamentals in the age of desktop bibliometrics (2018)Engaging young scholars in science through publication: A survey analysis of published middle and high school authors (2022)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Personality and Individual Differences (1985)Evaluations: Hidden Costs, Questionable Benefits, and Superior Alternatives (2006)Attracted to open access journals: a bibliometric author analysis in the field of biology (2009)Mindfulness Research Guide: a New Paradigm for Managing Empirical Health Information (2010)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (1992)Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources (1994)Scholarly Communication, Scholarly Publishing and University Libraries. Plus Ça Change? (2014)Open Access, Open Science, Open Society (2016)Comparative study of characteristics of authors between open access and non-open access journals in library and information science (2017)Scientists behaving badly (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Learning to review submissions to peer reviewed journals: how do they do it? (2013)Dimensions of trust in scholarly communication: Problematizing peer review in the aftermath of John Bohannon's “Sting” in science (2016)Academics and the Field of Academic Publishing: Challenges and Approaches (2019)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)ASEAN Library and Information Science (LIS) research (2018–2022): a bibliometric analysis with strategies for enhanced global impact (2023)Use of social media in urology: data from the A merican U rological A ssociation ( AUA ) (2013)International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: 12-Month Experience (2014)The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings (2014)Analysis of the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress Twitter Hashtags and Its Impact on Online Engagement and Attendance Rates (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality (2024)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Twitter mood predicts the stock market (2011)Can We Count on Social Media Metrics? (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2015Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research53 cited
  • 2005Publications as a measure of scientific advancement and of scientists' productivity52 cited
  • 2015Open Access Publishing: A Literature Review35 cited
  • 2015Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F 1000 P rime peer review34 cited
  • 2012Peer review in a rapidly evolving publishing landscape24 cited
  • 2019Association Between Twitter Reception at a National Urology Conference and Future Publication Status21 cited
  • 2023Biomedical publishing: Past historic, present continuous, future conditional20 cited
  • 2015The effects of research level and article type on the differences between citation metrics and F 1000 recommendations17 cited
  • 2015Altmetrics (Chapter from Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact)14 cited
  • 2019How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators13 cited
  • 2021Lung cancer research and its citation on clinical practice guidelines13 cited
  • 2019F1000Prime recommended articles and their citations: an exploratory study of four journals11 cited
  • 2020Bringing the review process into the 21st century: Post-publication peer review10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015F1000Prime: an analysis of discipline-specific reader data from Mendeley9 cited