SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior?
0 references·16 citing·48 second hopsampled
Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior? (1982)Do jurors share a common understanding co…After 30 years, what do we know about what jurors know? A meta-analytic review of lay knowledge regarding eyewitness factors. (2010)After 30 years, what do we kn…Beliefs about factors affecting the Reliability of eyewitness testimony: A Comparison of judges, jurors and the general public (2009)Beliefs about factors affecti…A survey of people's attitudes and beliefs about false confessions (2008)A survey of people's attitude…Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (2003)Handbook of psychology in leg…How effective are the cross-examination and expert testimony safeguards? Jurors' perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures. (2002)How effective are the cross-e…The case for expert testimony about eyewitness memory. (1995)The case for expert testimony…Eyewitness identification: Psychological research and legal policy on lineups. (1995)Eyewitness identification: Ps…The Psychology of Eyewitness Testimony: A Comparison of Experts and Prospective Jurors (1992)The Psychology of Eyewitness …The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness. (1990)The child in the eyes of the …The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. (1989)The eyewitness, the expert ps…Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis (1989)Expert testimony and jury dec…Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation. (1988)Improving the reliability of …The Child in the Eyes of the Jury: Assessing Mock Jurors’ Perceptions of the Child Witness (1987)The Child in the Eyes of the …Ten years in the life of an expert witness. (1986)Ten years in the life of an e…The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. (1983)The ability of prospective ju…Silence is not golden. (1983)Silence is not golden.The psychology of sex differences (1975)Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1984)The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors' charging decisions in sexual assault cases (1997)The nature of children’s true and false narratives (2002)The investigative interviewing of children and other vulnerable witnesses: Psychological research and working/professional practice (2009)Communication And Persuasion (2017)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. (1997)Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. (1979)Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a jury? (1983)Eyewitness identification: The importance of lineup models. (1986)Police Lineups as Experiments (1990)Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. (1991)Manuscript Preparation (1997)The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? (1999)A Teaching Aid for Improving Jurors' Assessments of Eyewitness Accuracy (2012)Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness evidence? (2017)HendersonInstructions: Do They Enhance Evidence Evaluation? (2017)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)Readings in Social Psychology. (1959)The Empirical Study of the Persuasive Effects of Evidence The Status After Fifty Years of Research (1988)Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The influence of jurors' preconceptions and witness behavior. (1989)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1994)Criminal Justice and Behavior (1980)Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. (1985)Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters. (1991)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)Identification accuracy of children versus adults: A meta-analysis. (1998)Eyewitness identification: Information gain from incriminating and exonerating behaviors. (2002)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. (1997)Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility (2000)Describing inner experience?: proponent meets skeptic (2008)The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process (1977)The Social Psychology of False Confessions: Compliance, Internalization, and Confabulation (1996)The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook (2003)False Confessions (2008)Confessions That Corrupt (2011)Minimization and maximization techniques: assessing the perceived consequences of confessing and confession diagnosticity (2012)Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. (1988)Nonadversarial Methods for Sensitizing Jurors to Eyewitness Evidence (1990)Turning Mirrors Into Windows?: Assessing the Impact of (Mock) Juror Education in Rape Trials (2009)The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. (1973)A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: The case of defendant characteristics. (1979)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1988Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation.178 cited
  • 1983The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.136 cited
  • 1990The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness.123 cited
  • 1989The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury.119 cited
  • 1987The Child in the Eyes of the Jury: Assessing Mock Jurors’ Perceptions of the Child Witness119 cited
  • 2008A survey of people's attitudes and beliefs about false confessions112 cited
  • 1989Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis101 cited
  • 2010After 30 years, what do we know about what jurors know? A meta-analytic review of lay knowledge regarding eyewitness factors.93 cited
  • 1983Silence is not golden.85 cited
  • 1995The case for expert testimony about eyewitness memory.84 cited
  • 2009Beliefs about factors affecting the Reliability of eyewitness testimony: A Comparison of judges, jurors and the general public83 cited
  • 2003Handbook of psychology in legal contexts72 cited
  • 2002How effective are the cross-examination and expert testimony safeguards? Jurors' perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures.70 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1992The Psychology of Eyewitness Testimony: A Comparison of Experts and Prospective Jurors63 cited
  • 1995Eyewitness identification: Psychological research and legal policy on lineups.63 cited
  • 1986Ten years in the life of an expert witness.58 cited