Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Making group assessment transparent: what wikis can contribute to collaborative projects

7 references·6 citing·55 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment4,064 cited
2008Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum293 cited
2008New learning network paradigms: Communities of objectives, crowdsourcing, wikis and open source234 cited
2001"A Narrow Thinking System": Nonnative-English-Speaking Students in Group Projects across the Curriculum224 cited
1999Undergraduate Marketing Students, Group Projects, and Teamwork: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly?216 cited
2003Making Groups Work: University Students' Perceptions173 cited
2006Group work at university: significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals142 cited

Cited by

2017Preparing internationally recruited students to become effective and reflective teacher-researchers at the UCL Institute of Education108 cited
2019Group Work Assessment: Assessing Social Skills at Group Level78 cited
2016Employing Wikipedia for good not evil: innovative approaches to collaborative writing assessment55 cited
2013A Framework for Assessing the Pedagogical Effectiveness of Wiki-Based Collaborative Writing: Results and Implications18 cited
2016Wikis for group work: Encouraging transparency, benchmarking, and feedback15 cited
2016Participation and collaborative learning in large class sizes: wiki, can you help me?13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work