Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Nash-Cournot or Lindahl Behavior?: An Empirical Test for the Nato Allies

4 references·16 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986On the private provision of public goods2,282 cited
1972The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments905 cited
1983The private provision of a public good is independent of the distribution of income656 cited
1988Alternative non-nested specification tests of time-series investment models89 cited

Cited by

2017Demand for military spending in NATO, 1968–2015: A spatial panel approach95 cited
2005Impure Public Goods and Technological Interdependencies89 cited
1996Nato burden sharing: 1960–199285 cited
1994ALTERNATIVE COLLECTIVE‐GOODS MODELS OF MILITARY ALLIANCES: THEORY AND EMPIRICS83 cited
1994The Theory of Collective Action and NATO Defense Burdens: New Empirical Tests80 cited
1994Chapter 29 Game theory models of peace and war72 cited
1990Mixed public‐private benefit and public‐good supply with application to the NATO alliance72 cited
2022NATO defense demand, free riding, and the Russo-Ukrainian war in 202270 cited
2014Free-riding in alliances: Testing an old theory with a new method67 cited
1995Chapter 4 The demand for military expenditure63 cited
2012Public Good Provision and Ancillary Benefits: The Case of Climate Agreements

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

60 cited

2002School finance reform and voluntary fiscal federalism55 cited

1995Are government or private enterprises more likely to engage in dumping? Some international evidence14 cited

2019Behavioral Economics and the Economics of Identity1 cited

2019Rational Choice Theory1 cited

2021Literature Review1 cited