SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Interest Group Success in the Courts: Amicus Participation in the Supreme Court
11 references·16 citing·43 second hop
Interest Group Success in the Courts: Amicus Participation in the Supreme Court (1993)Interest Group Success in the Courts: Ami…Supreme Court Decision Making (2005)Supreme Court Decision MakingWho Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals (1992)Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs…Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court (1992)Ideology, Status, and The Dif…Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court: Who Participates, When, and How Much? (1990)Amici Curiae before the Supre…Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices (1989)Ideological Values and the Vo…Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court (1988)Organized Interests and Agend…Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970 (1987)Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead…The Diversification of the Federal Bench: Policy and Process Ramifications (1985)The Diversification of the Fe…Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962-1981 (1984)Predicting Supreme Court Case…Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978 (1981)Personal Attribute Models of …Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change (1974)Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahea…When “Best Practices” Win, Employees Lose: Symbolic Compliance and Judicial Inference in Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Cases (2015)When “Best Practices” Win, Em…The Influence of Lobbying Activityin State Legislatures: Evidence from Wisconsin (2011)The Influence of Lobbying Act…Emotions, Oral Arguments, and Supreme Court Decision Making (2011)Emotions, Oral Arguments, and…Who Sings in the Heavenly Chorus? (2010)Who Sings in the Heavenly Cho…Lobbying and Influence (2010)Lobbying and InfluenceThe Consistency of Judicial Choice (2008)The Consistency of Judicial C…Amici Curiae and Dissensus on the U.S. Supreme Court (2008)Amici Curiae and Dissensus on…Lobbyists before the U.S. Supreme Court (2007)Lobbyists before the U.S. Sup…Lobbying Strategies, Venue Selection, and Organized Interest Involvement at the U.S. Supreme Court (2004)Lobbying Strategies, Venue Se…Information Provision, Organizational Constraints, and the Decision to Submit an Amicus Curiae Brief in a U.S. Supreme Court Case (2004)Information Provision, Organi…Designing Tests of the Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers (2004)Designing Tests of the Suprem…The Supreme Court, the Solicitor General, and the Separation of Powers (2003)The Supreme Court, the Solici…Why the Haves Don't Always Come Out Ahead: Repeat Players Meet Amici CCuriae for the Disadvantaged (2000)Why the Haves Don't Always Co…Congressional Preferences, Perceptions of Threat, and Supreme Court Decision Making (2000)Congressional Preferences, Pe…The Development of a Legal Rule: The Federal Common Law of Public Nuisance (1998)The Development of a Legal Ru…Justices' Responses To Case Facts (1996)Justices' Responses To Case F…The Selection of Disputes for Litigation (1984)Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity (1991)Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success (1995)The Legal Environments of Organizations (1997)Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods (1969)Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (1977)Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (1977)Studying Courts Comparatively: The View from the American States (1995)Do the “Haves” Come Out Ahead over Time? Applying Galanter's Framework to Decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 1925-1988 (1999)Constitutional Review and the Selective Promotion of Case Results (2005)A theory of data. (1960)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Handbook of social psychology (1990)Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts (1997)Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 (2002)The Judicial Common Space (2007)The Logic of Collective Action. (1966)The Concept of Representation (1967)The Concept of Representation, by Hanna F. Pitkin (1969)A Spatial Model of Roll Call Voting: Senators, Constituents, Presidents, and Interest Groups in Supreme Court Confirmations (1992)Networking vs. allying: the decision of interest groups to join coalitions in the US and the EU (2007)Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research (2012)Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics (1983)The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes (1991)Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review (2001)The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (1966)Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values. (1969)Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts (1990)Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective (2016)How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence (2020)A theory of justice original editionThe Logic of Collective Action (1965)Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. (1970)The Social Control of Impersonal Trust (1987)Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law (1992)The New Comparative Economics (2003)The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State (1992)Elaborating the “New Institutionalism” (2009)Symbolic Politics (1993)The Psychology of Group Conflict and the Dynamics of Oppression (1993)Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers: Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress (1999)Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court (1997)The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice (1997)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1974Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change2,807 cited
  • 1989Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices731 cited
  • 2005Supreme Court Decision Making455 cited
  • 1988Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court439 cited
  • 1984Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962-1981362 cited
  • 1981Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978303 cited
  • 1992Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals243 cited
  • 1987Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970220 cited
  • 1992Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court199 cited
  • 1990Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court: Who Participates, When, and How Much?196 cited
  • 1985The Diversification of the Federal Bench: Policy and Process Ramifications190 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Lobbyists before the U.S. Supreme Court118 cited
  • 2004Designing Tests of the Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers117 cited
  • 2010Lobbying and Influence91 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2010Who Sings in the Heavenly Chorus?81 cited
  • 2011Emotions, Oral Arguments, and Supreme Court Decision Making71 cited
  • 2003The Supreme Court, the Solicitor General, and the Separation of Powers70 cited
  • 2004Information Provision, Organizational Constraints, and the Decision to Submit an Amicus Curiae Brief in a U.S. Supreme Court Case70 cited
  • 2008The Consistency of Judicial Choice69 cited
  • 1996Justices' Responses To Case Facts67 cited
  • 2000Why the Haves Don't Always Come Out Ahead: Repeat Players Meet Amici CCuriae for the Disadvantaged65 cited
  • 2008Amici Curiae and Dissensus on the U.S. Supreme Court63 cited
  • 2015When “Best Practices” Win, Employees Lose: Symbolic Compliance and Judicial Inference in Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Cases54 cited
  • 2011The Influence of Lobbying Activityin State Legislatures: Evidence from Wisconsin47 cited
  • 1998The Development of a Legal Rule: The Federal Common Law of Public Nuisance45 cited
  • 2004Lobbying Strategies, Venue Selection, and Organized Interest Involvement at the U.S. Supreme Court44 cited
  • 2000Congressional Preferences, Perceptions of Threat, and Supreme Court Decision Making42 cited