Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Assessment of the commonsense psychology underlying Daubert: Legal decision makers' abilities to evaluate expert evidence in hostile work environment cases.

16 references·11 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1974Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases28,742 cited
1975Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases22,647 cited
1977Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.11,315 cited
1972The attraction paradigm4,369 cited
1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
1987Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.407 cited
1988The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday-life events.341 cited
1991Federal Rules of Evidence272 cited
1987Teaching Reasoning272 cited
1988Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis.176 cited
1983Inductive reasoning: Competence or skill?167 cited
1983Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a jury?155 cited
1992Real jurors' understanding of the law in real cases.144 cited
2000The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers?143 cited
2013Rules for Reasoning

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

137 cited

1986The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgment.131 cited

Cited by

2004Explaining sexual harassment judgments: Looking beyond gender of the rater.62 cited
2009Psychological mediators of the effects of opposing expert testimony on juror decisions.42 cited
2005Judicial Application of Daubert to Psychological Syndrome and Profile Evidence: A Research Note.39 cited
2010I spy with my little eye: Jurors’ detection of internal validity threats in expert evidence.38 cited
2007The role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials29 cited
2019Variations in reliability and validity do not influence judge, attorney, and mock juror decisions about psychological expert evidence.27 cited
2017Individual versus group decision making: Jurors’ reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony26 cited
2010Attributions of blame and responsibility in sexual harassment: Reexamining a psychological model.26 cited
2015Cross-examination educates jurors about missing control groups in scientific evidence.14 cited
2010A qualitative analysis of mock jurors' deliberations of linkage analysis evidence13 cited
2014De la mère « normale ». Normes, expertises et justice en protection de la jeunesse12 cited