SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Error correction, revision, and learning · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleError correction, revision, and learning

John Truscott2008

Article2008

Error correction, revision, and learning

John Truscott · Angela Yi-ping Hsu

414 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Second Language Writing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Student Assessment and Feedback Second Language Acquisition and Learning

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 414 citations exist upstream.

References

1996The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes 2003The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing 2001Error feedback in L2 writing classes 1999The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to truscott (1996)2007The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately 2004The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?)2006Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction 1990Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.

Cited by

2015The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta‐Analysis 2012The potential role(s) of writing in second language development 2014Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction 2013The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2011THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FEEDBACK FOR L1‐ENGLISH AND L2‐WRITING DEVELOPMENT: A META‐ANALYSISarticle · 13 shared references 2008The role of teacher’s corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL learners’ writing accuracy over time: is learner’s mother tongue relevant?chapter · 12 shared references 2012A Case for Direct and Indirect Feedback: The Other Side of Coinarticle · 12 shared references 2016A suggested model of corrective feedback provisionarticle · 12 shared references 2010SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING RESEARCH AND WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SLAarticle · 11 shared references 2012A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CFarticle · 11 shared references

Details

Year2008

Typearticle

Published2008-07-27

VenueJournal of Second Language Writing

ISSN-L1060-3743

Languageen

Citations414

Files0 public / 0

ShelfEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003

openalex_workW2068495385

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2010Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy

2010Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Insights, and Future Directions

2015Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing

2014An investigation into current measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research