SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleMethodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment

Keith James Topping2009

Article2009

Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment

Keith James Topping

183 citations·0/0 files stored·Learning and Instruction

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Student Assessment and Feedback Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods Evaluation of Teaching Practices

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 183 citations exist upstream.

References

2006A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class 2009Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning 2009Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions 2009Student revision with peer and expert reviewing 2009Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?2009Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions 2009The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL

Cited by

2016Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay 2016Effects of different online peer-feedback approaches on students' performance skills, motivation and self-efficacy in a dance course 2018Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills 2020Developing student competence through peer assessment: the role of feedback, self-regulation and evaluative judgement 2013Peer assessment without assessment criteria

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2009Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspectivearticle · 6 shared references 2009Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developmentsarticle · 6 shared references 2010Investigating secondary school students’ unmediated peer assessment skillsarticle · 6 shared references 2009Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptionsarticle · 5 shared references 2013Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school studentsarticle · 5 shared references 2020When peers agree, do students listen? The central role of feedback quality and feedback frequency in determining uptake of feedbackarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2009

Typearticle

Published2009-09-11

VenueLearning and Instruction

ISSN-L0959-4752

Languageen

Citations183

Files0 public / 0

ShelfStudent Assessment and Feedback

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003

openalex_workW2069265257

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2017Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills

2015Structuring peer assessment: Comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content

2010Investigating secondary school students’ unmediated peer assessment skills