SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The cognitive effects of jury aids on decision-making in complex civil litigation
16 references·3 citing·46 second hop
The cognitive effects of jury aids on decision-making in complex civil litigation (2005)The cognitive effects of jury aids on dec…Predictably Incoherent Judgments (2002)Predictably Incoherent Judgme…Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials. (2002)Judge and attorney experience…Changes in the standards for admitting expert evidence in federal civil cases since the Daubert decision. (2002)Changes in the standards for …Bias in Jurors vs Bias in Juries: New Evidence from the SDS Perspective (1999)Bias in Jurors vs Bias in Jur…Assessing Punitive Damages (With Notes on Cognition and Valuation in Law) (1998)Assessing Punitive Damages (W…Effects of trial complexity on decision making. (1996)Effects of trial complexity o…Verdict: assessing the civil jury system (1994)Verdict: assessing the civil …Juror notetaking and question asking during trials: A national field experiment. (1994)Juror notetaking and question…Effects of notetaking on verdicts and evidence processing in a civil trial. (1994)Effects of notetaking on verd…The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. (1991)The trouble of thinking: Acti…Are Twelve Heads Better than One? (1989)Are Twelve Heads Better than …Increasing jurors' participation in trials: A field experiment with jury notetaking and question asking. (1988)Increasing jurors' participat…Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis. (1988)Expert psychological testimon…Note taking as a generative activity. (1978)Note taking as a generative a…Note taking versus note having. (1975)Note taking versus note havin…Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density. (1975)Memory for a lecture: Effects…Note Taking and Note Reviewing Enhance Jurors' Recall of Trial Information (2016)Note Taking and Note Reviewin…The impact of note taking style and note availability at retrieval on mock jurors’ recall and recognition of trial information (2015)The impact of note taking sty…Assisting jurors: Promoting recall of trial information through the use of a trial‐ordered notebook (2012)Assisting jurors: Promoting r…Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions (1979)Blindfolding the Jury to Verdict Consequences: Damages, Experts, and the Civil Jury (1992)What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process. (1997)What do we know about rape myths and juror decision making? (2020)What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does) (1993)Social Norms and Social Roles (1996)Crime, Deterrence, and Right‐to‐Carry Concealed Handguns (1997)Probability Neglect: Emotions, Worst Cases, and Law (2002)Beyond the Precautionary Principle (2003)Debiasing through Law (2006)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. (2001)Attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim (2008)Understanding attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim (2009)MANUAL FOR KIT OF REFERENCE TESTS FOR COGNITIVE FACTORS (REVISED 1963) (1963)Listening and note taking. (1972)Students' note-taking behaviors and the efficacy of providing the instructor's notes for review (1985)Notetaking and review: The research and its implications (1987)Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences (2013)An integrative review of the cognitive costs and benefits of note-taking (2017)Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View (1968)Learning as a generative process 1 (1974)Elaboration techniques that increase the meaningfulness of technical text: An experimental test of the learning strategy hypothesis. (1980)Getting Students “Partially” Involved in Note-Taking Using Graphic Organizers (2000)The German Advantage in Civil Procedure (1985)An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence (1999)Modern scientific evidence : the law and science of expert testimony (2006)Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them? (2013)Adversarial Allegiance among Expert Witnesses (2015)Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making (2022)Nature of Prejudice (1954)Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. (1980)Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. (1989)On the Nature of Prejudice: Automatic and Controlled Processes (1997)Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. (2002)Seeing Black: Race, Crime, and Visual Processing. (2004)The Morality of Freedom (1988)A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics (1998)The Law of Group Polarization (2002)Economic Analysis of Contract Law after Three Decades: Success or Failure? (2003)Mathemagenic Behaviours and Efficiency in Learning from Prose Materials: Review, Critique and Recommendations (1976)Differential Treatment of Corporate Defendants by Juries: An Examination of the “Deep-Pockets” Hypothesis (1996)Explaining "pain and suffering" awards: The role of injury characteristics and fault attributions. (1997)Goal conflict in juror assessments of compensatory and punitive damages. (1999)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1991The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs.1,316 cited
  • 2002Predictably Incoherent Judgments275 cited
  • 1998Assessing Punitive Damages (With Notes on Cognition and Valuation in Law)264 cited
  • 1978Note taking as a generative activity.191 cited
  • 1988Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis.176 cited
  • 1975Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density.165 cited
  • 1975Note taking versus note having.140 cited
  • 1989Are Twelve Heads Better than One?129 cited
  • 1994Verdict: assessing the civil jury system109 cited
  • 2002Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials.86 cited
  • 1999Bias in Jurors vs Bias in Juries: New Evidence from the SDS Perspective76 cited
  • 2002Changes in the standards for admitting expert evidence in federal civil cases since the Daubert decision.64 cited
  • 1988Increasing jurors' participation in trials: A field experiment with jury notetaking and question asking.64 cited
  • 1994Effects of notetaking on verdicts and evidence processing in a civil trial.51 cited
  • 1996Effects of trial complexity on decision making.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

50 cited
  • 1994Juror notetaking and question asking during trials: A national field experiment.41 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015The impact of note taking style and note availability at retrieval on mock jurors’ recall and recognition of trial information16 cited
    • 2012Assisting jurors: Promoting recall of trial information through the use of a trial‐ordered notebook14 cited
    • 2016Note Taking and Note Reviewing Enhance Jurors' Recall of Trial Information10 cited