SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An under-used yet easily understood statistic: the number needed to treat (NNT)
11 references·1 citing·37 second hop
An under-used yet easily understood statistic: the number needed to treat (NNT) (2006)An under-used yet easily understood stati…Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) (2006)Physiotherapy Evidence Databa…The Numbers Needed to Treat for Neurological Disorders (2005)The Numbers Needed to Treat f…Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (2003)Reliability of the PEDro Scal…Evidence-based evaluation of benefits in therapeutic interventions: methodologically controlled and non-randomly assigned reflections on the number needed to treat. (2003)Evidence-based evaluation of …Can we individualize the ‘number needed to treat’? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses (2002)Can we individualize the ‘num…How to estimate treatment effects from reports of clinical trials. II: Dichotomous outcomes (2000)How to estimate treatment eff…How to estimate treatment effects from reports of clinical trials. I: Continuous outcomes (2000)How to estimate treatment eff…Applying ‘Evidence-Based Medicine’ Theory to Interventional Radiology.Part 2: A Spreadsheet for Swift Assessment of Procedural Benefit and Harm (2000)Applying ‘Evidence-Based Medi…PEDro: A Database of Randomised Controlled Trials in Physiotherapy (1998)PEDro: A Database of Randomis…Using Numerical Results from Systematic Reviews in Clinical Practice (1997)Using Numerical Results from …An evidence based approach to individualising treatment (1995)An evidence based approach to…Gauging the impact of behavior change interventions: A tutorial on the Numbers Needed to Treat (2017)Gauging the impact of behavio…QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment (1988)Meta-analysis: State-of-the-Science (1992)Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis (2001)Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Measured Enthusiasm: Does the Method of Reporting Trial Results Alter Perceptions of Therapeutic Effectiveness? (1992)Down with odds ratios! (1996)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (1997)Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions (2011)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study (2009)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Some Statistical Methods for Combining Experimental Results (1990)What is evidence-based medicine?1 (2004)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results (2005)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes (2012)Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses---sometimes informative, usually misleading (1999)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs andn-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale (2008)PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis (2012)PEDro or Cochrane to Assess the Quality of Clinical Trials? A Meta-Epidemiological Study (2015)A systematic review of mentorship programs to facilitate transition to post-secondary education and employment for youth and young adults with disabilities (2015)Interventions to improve gross motor performance in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: a meta-analysis (2016)The use of commercial computerised cognitive games in older adults: a meta-analysis (2020)Sufficiently Important Difference for Common Cold: Severity Reduction (2007)Forest plots (2014)What does ‘clinically important’ really mean? (2008)Statistical inference through estimation: recommendations from the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials4,799 cited
  • 1997Using Numerical Results from Systematic Reviews in Clinical Practice453 cited
  • 1995An evidence based approach to individualising treatment389 cited
  • 2002Can we individualize the ‘number needed to treat’? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses319 cited
  • 2006Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)140 cited
  • 2000How to estimate treatment effects from reports of clinical trials. I: Continuous outcomes131 cited
  • 1998PEDro: A Database of Randomised Controlled Trials in Physiotherapy90 cited
  • 2000How to estimate treatment effects from reports of clinical trials. II: Dichotomous outcomes58 cited
  • 2000Applying ‘Evidence-Based Medicine’ Theory to Interventional Radiology.Part 2: A Spreadsheet for Swift Assessment of Procedural Benefit and Harm24 cited
  • 2005The Numbers Needed to Treat for Neurological Disorders11 cited
  • 2003Evidence-based evaluation of benefits in therapeutic interventions: methodologically controlled and non-randomly assigned reflections on the number needed to treat.9 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Gauging the impact of behavior change interventions: A tutorial on the Numbers Needed to Treat6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work