CHAMPIONS OF CHANGE AND STRATEGIC SHIFTS: THE ROLE OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CHANGE ADVOCATES*

Ari Ginsberg · Eric Abrahamson

161 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Management Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Management and Organizational Studies Organizational Change and Leadership Organizational Management and Leadership

Abstract

ABSTRACT Change advocates who participate in the process of strategy‐making can play an important role in enabling organizational adaptation. To examine the nature of this role, this article investigates the influence on strategic shifts of two such participants ‐ new members of the top management team and management consultants. Empirical findings suggest that managers see these two types of change agents as having two different kinds of influence on strategic shifts. Specifically, the change agent role of management consultants is viewed as one that creates pressure for change by helping to shape new managerial perspectives of the environment. In contrast, the change agent role of new members of the top management team is viewed as one that counteracts inertial forces that may block the implementation of change. These results suggest that management consultants may be much more useful in stimulating changes in the ways executives think about their environment than they are in implementing radical strategic changes. To overcome institutional resistance to extreme strategic shifts, organizations may need to resort to stronger political and symbolic actions, such as promoting or hiring new top executives in key leadership roles.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 161 citations exist upstream.

References

1983The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields 1977Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony 2004The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields 1977The Population Ecology of Organizations 1986Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments 1953Field Theory in Social Science 1983Strategy‐making and environment: The third link 1981How Organizations Learn and Unlearn

Cited by

2013The Role of Management Innovation in Enabling Technological Process Innovation: An Inter‐Organizational Perspective 2001Champions, adapters, consultants and synergists: the new change agents in HRM 2018The Ties That Unbind: Socialization and Business-Owning Family Reference Point Shift 2003Change leaders and change managers: different or complementary?2010Corporate Sustainability and the Individual: Understanding What Drives Sustainability Professionals as Change Agents

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.