No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
The contention of this paper is that many activities in the communicative language teaching (CLT) classroom discourage reflection or contemplation. The first part of this paper analyzes the prominence in CLT of phenomenalistic and intuitive activities which, with their emphases on conspicuous action and spontaneous response, suggest a proclivity to a nonreflective view of language acquisition. The second part, making use of what philosophers and psychologists have concluded about reflection, examines when, how, and why a person reflects. The last part of the paper discusses three types of CLT activities which could encourage reflection: task-oriented, process-oriented, and synthesis-oriented. The conclusion is that more activities centered around reflective thinking should be incorporated in ESL/EFL classrooms to supplement the valuable phenomenally and intuitively oriented activities.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 59 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.