SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Implementation of a Journal Peer Reviewer Stratification System Based on Quality and Reliability
3 references·5 citing·39 second hop
Implementation of a Journal Peer Reviewer Stratification System Based on Quality and Reliability (2010)Implementation of a Journal Peer Reviewer…Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of Reviews (2002)Effect of Written Feedback by…Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for Assessing Peer Reviews of Manuscripts (1999)Development of the Review Qua…Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts (1998)Reliability of Editors' Subje…Impact of peer review on discussion of study limitations and strength of claims in randomized trial reports: a before and after study (2019)Impact of peer review on disc…Resident Research Tips: Surviving and Thriving Within the Peer Review Process (2017)Resident Research Tips: Survi…Are Reviewers’ Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports (2015)Are Reviewers’ Scores Influen…Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review (2014)Review of the Ethics and Etiq…Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial (2012)Does mentoring new peer revie…Agreement among reviewers of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language (1994)ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (2004)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality (1986)Effect of Attendance at a Training Session on Peer Reviewer Quality and Performance (1998)Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial (2007)Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review (2019)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases (2010)Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1971)A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1999)Heuristic Decision Making (2010)Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers? (2017)Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences (2018)Accelerated Peer Review and Paper Processing Models in Academic Publishing (2022)Complex Problem Solving: Principles and Mechanisms (1992)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)The ethics of peer review in bioethics (2013)Complex Problem Solving (2014)Editorial: Peer Review and the Editorial Process - A Look Behind the Curtain (2014)Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field (2017)‘Why not give us the full story?’: functions of referees’ comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers (2003)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Perceptions of Ethical Problems with Scientific Journal Peer Review: An Exploratory Study (2008)Is a journal's ranking related to the reviewer's academic impact? (An empirical study based on Publons) (2021)Experiential Learning : Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (1983)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Hedging in Scientific Research Articles (1998)Hedging in scientific research articles. By Ken Hyland. (Pragmatics and beyond 54.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1998. Pp. x, 307. (1999)Limitations in Medical Research: Recognition, Influence, and Warning (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for Assessing Peer Reviews of Manuscripts177 cited
  • 1998Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts122 cited
  • 2002Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of Reviews76 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial89 cited
  • 2014Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review19 cited
  • 2015Are Reviewers’ Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports12 cited
  • 2019Impact of peer review on discussion of study limitations and strength of claims in randomized trial reports: a before and after study10 cited
  • 2017Resident Research Tips: Surviving and Thriving Within the Peer Review Process8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work