Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A new look at within-source interrater reliability of 360-degree feedback ratings.

15 references·16 citing·46 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1979Review of Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).11,425 cited
1996The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.5,875 cited
1971Recovery of Inter-Block Information when Block Sizes are Unequal4,069 cited
1992Generalizability theory: a primer1,298 cited
1996Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings.771 cited
1992Elements of Generalizability Theory599 cited
1995CAN MULTI‐SOURCE FEEDBACK CHANGE PERCEPTIONS OF GOAL ACCOMPLISHMENT, SELF‐EVALUATIONS, AND PERFORMANCE‐RELATED OUTCOMES? THEORY‐BASED APPLICATIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH482 cited
1997Psychometric Properties of Multisource Performance Ratings: A meta-Analysis of Subordinate, Supervisor, Peer, and Self-Ratings469 cited
1984A role set analysis of managerial reputation351 cited
1993The impact of 360‐degree feedback on management skills development261 cited
1990Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe.221 cited
1997Advancing the State of the Art of 360-Degree Feedback156 cited
1982Performance appraisal decisions as a function of rater training and purpose of the appraisal.140 cited
1997Accountability129 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1993Attitudes of first‐line supervisors toward subordinate appraisals84 cited

Cited by

2001Goal congruence in project teams: Does the fit between members' personal mastery and performance goals matter?278 cited
2000INTERRATER CORRELATIONS DO NOT ESTIMATE THE RELIABILITY OF JOB PERFORMANCE RATINGS183 cited
2009Are cultural characteristics associated with the relationship between self and others’ ratings of leadership?148 cited
2011The value of virtue in the upper echelons: A multisource examination of executive character strengths and performance135 cited
2010Improving the Effectiveness of Students in Groups With a Centralized Peer Evaluation System133 cited
2021Frogs in boiling water: a moderated-mediation model of exploitative leadership, fear of negative evaluation and knowledge hiding behaviors132 cited
2011Performance management effectiveness: practices or context?127 cited
2011Empathic emotion and leadership performance: An empirical analysis across 38 countries119 cited
2019The malevolent side of organizational identification: unraveling the impact of psychological entitlement and manipulative personality on unethical work behaviors117 cited
2004Easing the Inferential Leap in Competency Modelling: The Effects of Task‐related Information and Subject Matter Expertise*117 cited
2011Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: Testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism.113 cited
2008Ill-structured measurement designs in organizational research: Implications for estimating interrater reliability.108 cited
2012Observer ratings of instructional quality: Do they fulfill what they promise?107 cited
2000Which leadership roles matter to whom? an examination of rater effects on perceptions of effectiveness101 cited
2003A FIELD STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF RATING PURPOSE ON THE QUALITY OF MULTISOURCE RATINGS91 cited
2001360 Feedback from Another Angle89 cited