SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations
5 references·16 citing·53 second hop
The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations (2013)The Assessment of Science: The Relative M…A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)A Principal Component Analysi…What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? (2004)What determines the citation …Normative versus Social Constructivist Processes in the Allocation of Citations: A Network-Analytic Model (1998)Normative versus Social Const…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Sense and nonsense about the impact factor (1997)Sense and nonsense about the …The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science (2024)The crisis of peer review: Pa…Top 100 most‐cited papers in core dental public health journals: bibliometric analysis (2020)Top 100 most‐cited papers in …Low replicability can support robust and efficient science (2020)Low replicability can support…COVID-19 will stimulate a new coronavirus research breakthrough: a 20-year bibliometric analysis (2020)COVID-19 will stimulate a new…Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda (2020)Changing research on research…Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia (2019)Games academics play and thei…The most downloaded and most cited articles in radiology journals: a comparative bibliometric analysis (2018)The most downloaded and most …Publications as predictors of racial and ethnic differences in NIH research awards (2018)Publications as predictors of…The 100 most-cited articles in neuroimaging: A bibliometric analysis (2016)The 100 most-cited articles i…Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media (2016)Altmetrics: an analysis of th…Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics (2015)Web indicators for research e…Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web (2015)Web indicators for research e…Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration (2015)Ten Simple Rules for a Succes…Reviewing post-publication peer review (2015)Reviewing post-publication pe…Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania (2014)Causes for the Persistence of…Bibliometric evaluation vs. informed peer review: Evidence from Italy (2014)Bibliometric evaluation vs. i…Getting to YES. Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (1983)Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in (1987)Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Collaboration (2007)The New ABCs of Research (2016)Using the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) as a tool for improving the design and reporting of manual therapy interventions (2016)Measuring the influence of non-scientific features on citations (2022)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science? (2015)The Impact Factor Fallacy (2018)How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)The scientific impact of nations (2004)Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results (2007)Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties (2013)Exploratory Research (2020)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (2014)Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact (2014)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)The Social System (1951)Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (1986)Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society (1987)Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists (2003)Citation analysis (2007)Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program (2009)ArnetMiner (2008)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data (2018)Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric.com, PlumX and Crossref Event Data (2018)Communicating Scientific Uncertainty in an Age of COVID-19: An Investigation into the Use of Preprints by Digital Media Outlets (2021)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards (2011)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Measuring Structural Racism: A Guide for Epidemiologists and Other Health Researchers (2021)Avoiding bias when inferring race using name-based approaches (2022)Enacting inclusive science: Culturally responsive higher education practices in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) (2024)The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I (1964)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Can I afford to publish? A dilemma for African scholars (2021)Primate conservation: Lessons learned in the last 20 years can guide future efforts (2021)Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences (2022)Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality (1997)Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research (1998)Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2009A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures574 cited
  • 2004What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?367 cited
  • 1998Normative versus Social Constructivist Processes in the Allocation of Citations: A Network-Analytic Model333 cited
  • 1997Sense and nonsense about the impact factor286 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania196 cited
  • 2016Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media191 cited
  • 2019Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia133 cited
  • 2018Publications as predictors of racial and ethnic differences in NIH research awards132 cited
  • 2015Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration92 cited
  • 2016The 100 most-cited articles in neuroimaging: A bibliometric analysis90 cited
  • 2014Bibliometric evaluation vs. informed peer review: Evidence from Italy86 cited
  • 2020Low replicability can support robust and efficient science79 cited
  • 2015Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

78 cited
  • 2020COVID-19 will stimulate a new coronavirus research breakthrough: a 20-year bibliometric analysis76 cited
  • 2015Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web75 cited
  • 2020Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda75 cited
  • 2015Reviewing post-publication peer review73 cited
  • 2024The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science70 cited
  • 2018The most downloaded and most cited articles in radiology journals: a comparative bibliometric analysis64 cited
  • 2020Top 100 most‐cited papers in core dental public health journals: bibliometric analysis63 cited