SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association
16 references·2 citing·48 second hop
The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association (2012)The evaluation of research papers in the …Peer review in scientific publications (2012)Peer review in scientific pub…Open Peer Review by a Selected-Papers Network (2012)Open Peer Review by a Selecte…Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation (2012)Multi-Stage Open Peer Review:…Economics and Research Assessment Systems (2012)Economics and Research Assess…Decoupling the scholarly journal (2012)Decoupling the scholarly jour…Toward a New Model of Scientific Publishing: Discussion and a Proposal (2011)Toward a New Model of Scienti…Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation (2011)Alternatives to Peer Review: …The Research Assessment Exercise, the state and the dominance of mainstream economics in British universities (2006)The Research Assessment Exerc…Evaluations: Hidden Costs, Questionable Benefits, and Superior Alternatives (2006)Evaluations: Hidden Costs, Qu…Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline (2004)Peer Review and the Social Co…The crisis in economics : the post-autistic economics movement : the first 600 days (2003)The crisis in economics : the…Publishing as Prostitution? Choosing between One's Own Ideas and Academic Failure (2002)Publishing as Prostitution? C…Can Peer Review Be Better Focused? (2002)Can Peer Review Be Better Foc…Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 2 (1998)Peer Review for Journals as i…Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1 (1998)Peer Review for Journals as i…The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)The Philosophical Basis of Pe…Dishonest Conformity in Peer Review (2015)Dishonest Conformity in Peer …Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Deep impact: unintended conse…How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists (1994)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Scientific peer review (2011)Bias in peer review (2012)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The History of the Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle (1970)Chase, Chance, and Creativity (1978)The History of Lithium Therapy (1984)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2008)Clickstream Data Yields High-Resolution Maps of Science (2009)Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s (2005)Theories of Social Capital: Researchers Behaving Badly (2010)Performance-based university research funding systems (2011)How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management (2012)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Local Knowledge: Further Essays In Interpretive Anthropology (1983)Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing (2001)GENERATING RESEARCH QUESTIONS THROUGH PROBLEMATIZATION. (2011)ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)Citation Statistics (2009)Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science (2012)Synthetic consciousness: the distributed adaptive control perspective (2016)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)"I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]" (2015)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The natural selection of bad science (2016)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957)The Economic Approach to Human Behavior (1976)The role of income aspirations in individual happiness (2004)Third-party punishment and social norms (2004)Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married? (2006)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (2017)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Predicting the Future with Social Media (2010)Twitter mood predicts the stock market (2011)Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)A Chronicle of Higher Education (2017)The Why and How of the Integrative Review (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1990The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation436 cited
  • 2004Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline234 cited
  • 1998Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1195 cited
  • 2006The Research Assessment Exercise, the state and the dominance of mainstream economics in British universities142 cited
  • 1998Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 2132 cited
  • 2012Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation105 cited
  • 2012Decoupling the scholarly journal85 cited
  • 2012Open Peer Review by a Selected-Papers Network85 cited
  • 2002Publishing as Prostitution? Choosing between One's Own Ideas and Academic Failure76 cited
  • 2003The crisis in economics : the post-autistic economics movement : the first 600 days75 cited
  • 2011Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation68 cited
  • 2011Toward a New Model of Scientific Publishing: Discussion and a Proposal59 cited
  • 2012Peer review in scientific publications52 cited
  • 2006Evaluations: Hidden Costs, Questionable Benefits, and Superior Alternatives37 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2002
Can Peer Review Be Better Focused?
30 cited
  • 2012Economics and Research Assessment Systems13 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2013Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank482 cited
    • 2015Dishonest Conformity in Peer Review14 cited