SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Applying findings from a systematic review of workplace‐based e‐learning: implications for health information professionals
16 references·3 citing·45 second hop
Applying findings from a systematic review of workplace‐based e‐learning: implications for health information professionals (2009)Applying findings from a systematic revie…Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of …Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…The role of reflection in the library and information sector: a systematic review (2007)The role of reflection in the…Virtual learning communities as a vehicle for workforce development: a case study (2006)Virtual learning communities …The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice (2006)The undergraduate experience …The role of library and information services in supporting learning (2004)The role of library and infor…The problem of appraising qualitative research (2004)The problem of appraising qua…Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)Standard Quality Assessment C…Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire (2004)Selecting, designing, and dev…E-Moderating (2004)E-ModeratingAn exploration of four web-based open and flexible learning modules in post-registration nurse education (2004)An exploration of four web-ba…Web based continuing professional development – a learning architecture approach (2003)Web based continuing professi…The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study (2003)The role of the information s…Critical Appraisal Guidelines for Single Case Study Research (2002)Critical Appraisal Guidelines…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (1986)Qualitative Data Analysis: A …Matching serious games with museum’s educational roles: smart education in practice (2019)Matching serious games with m…Desperately Seeking Dissonance (2012)Desperately Seeking DissonanceA typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Book Review: Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement (1993)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria (2002)"Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research? (2004)Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine (2017)Global Overview of Response Rates in Patient and Health Care Professional Surveys in Surgery (2020)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)THE DISCOVERY OF GROUNDED THEORY: STRATEGIES FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. By Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. 271 pp. $6.75 (1968)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (2012)Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. (1994)Communities of practice learning, meaning, and identity (1999)Research Methods in Education (2007)A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education (2012)Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation (2014)Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies (2018)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically (2002)Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals (2016)The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies (2018)Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta‐analysis (2023)Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs (1989)Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research (2007)ASSESSING TEACHING PRESENCE IN A COMPUTER CONFERENCING CONTEXT (2001)A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education (2009)Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? (2019)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods10,357 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies6,614 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies3,791 cited
  • 2004E-Moderating2,305 cited
  • 2004Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields1,748 cited
  • 2004Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire1,228 cited
  • 2004The problem of appraising qualitative research653 cited
  • 2006The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice415 cited
  • 2004An exploration of four web-based open and flexible learning modules in post-registration nurse education89 cited
  • 2003The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study84 cited
  • 2002Critical Appraisal Guidelines for Single Case Study Research63 cited
  • 2007The role of reflection in the library and information sector: a systematic review57 cited
  • 2003Web based continuing professional development – a learning architecture approach44 cited
  • 2006

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Virtual learning communities as a vehicle for workforce development: a case study
39 cited
  • 2004The role of library and information services in supporting learning2 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies11,662 cited
    • 2012Desperately Seeking Dissonance203 cited
    • 2019Matching serious games with museum’s educational roles: smart education in practice22 cited