SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
La revisión por pares en las revistas científicas
16 references·1 citing·30 second hop
La revisión por pares en las revistas científicas (2001)La revisión por pares en las revistas cie…Opening up BMJ peer review (1999)Opening up BMJ peer reviewEffect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer…Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect of Blinding and Unmask…Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality? (1998)Does Masking Author Identity …The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review (1994)The Effects of Blinding on Ac…Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable (1994)Peer review. Crude and unders…Peer Review (1994)Peer ReviewThe characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews (1993)The characteristics of peer r…The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)The Philosophical Basis of Pe…The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)The Evolution of Editorial Pe…The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. (1990)The effects of blinding on th…The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial (1990)The effects of blinding on th…The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review (1990)The Effects of Blinding on th…Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Peer Review in 18th-Century S…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer-review practices of psyc…Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)Peer review in biomedical pub…Revisión sistemática y metanálisis (I): conceptos básicos (2007)Revisión sistemática y metaná…THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN (1951)Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers (1979)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)The ups and downs of peer review (2007)Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research (2011)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)The Significance of Insecure and Disorganized Attachment for Children’s Internalizing Symptoms: A Meta-Analytic Study (2012)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors (2006)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Publication and related biases. (2000)Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)The Science of Reviewing Researcha (1993)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)A Descriptive and Historical Review of Bibliometrics with Applications to Medical Sciences (2015)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
  • 1990The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation436 cited
  • 1990Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism350 cited
  • 1990The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review346 cited
  • 1998Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports334 cited
  • 1998Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review281 cited
  • 1998Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?278 cited
  • 1990The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review261 cited
  • 1974Peer review in biomedical publication241 cited
  • 1994Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable235 cited
  • 1990The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial216 cited
  • 1999Opening up BMJ peer review191 cited
  • 1994The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review164 cited
  • 1994Peer Review155 cited
  • 1993The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews150 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1990
The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial.
113 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Revisión sistemática y metanálisis (I): conceptos básicos10 cited