SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reviewers, Authors, and Editors
10 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Reviewers, Authors, and Editors (1999)Reviewers, Authors, and EditorsWhat Are the Factors Determining Authorship and the Order of the Authors' Names? (1998)What Are the Factors Determin…Masking Author Identity in Peer Review (1998)Masking Author Identity in Pe…Freedom and Responsibility in Medical Publication (1998)Freedom and Responsibility in…Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer…Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect of Blinding and Unmask…Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality? (1998)Does Masking Author Identity …Congress on Biomedical Peer Review (1998)Congress on Biomedical Peer R…The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review (1994)The Effects of Blinding on Ac…The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)The Contributions of Authors …The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial (1990)The effects of blinding on th…Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (1994)American Medical Association manual of style : a guide for authors and editors (1998)Publishing Ethics in Psychiatry (2001)Efecto de la revisión estadística en la calidad de los manuscritos publicados en MEDICINA CLÍNICA: estudio aleatorizado (2003)Misconduct by researchers and authors (2007)The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty (1997)A robust formula to credit authors for their publications (2004)Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings (2005)Inventorship and authorship as attribution rights: An enquiry into the economics of scientific credit (2013)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care (1995)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)A Stronger Post-Publication Culture Is Needed for Better Science (2014)Social dynamics of research collaboration: norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining co-authorship rights (2014)The Publishing Game: Getting More for Less (1981)Scientific Collaboration Results in Higher Citation Rates of Published Articles (2006)Value of Strong Ties to Disconnected Others: Examining Knowledge Creation in Biomedicine (2008)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors (2006)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen? (1999)Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities (2013)Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study (2014)Publication and related biases. (2000)Assessing “Best Evidence”: Issues in Grading the Quality of Studies for Systematic Reviews (1999)Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta‐analyses (2003)We Have to Break Up (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1998Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports334 cited
  • 1994The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers293 cited
  • 1998Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review281 cited
  • 1998Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?278 cited
  • 1990The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial216 cited
  • 1994The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review164 cited
  • 1998What Are the Factors Determining Authorship and the Order of the Authors' Names?105 cited
  • 1998Masking Author Identity in Peer Review104 cited
  • 1998Freedom and Responsibility in Medical Publication60 cited
  • 1998Congress on Biomedical Peer Review28 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work