SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
STORIES statement: Publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis
11 references·16 citing·46 second hopsampled
STORIES statement: Publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis (2014)STORIES statement: Publication standards …RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)RAMESES publication standards…Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education (2013)Qualitative synthesis and sys…Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials (2013)Poor description of non-pharm…Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Meta-analysis of individual p…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: a guide to methods (2007)Synthesizing qualitative and …Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality (2002)Quality of Reporting of Rando…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. (1999)Assessing the quality of repo…Systematic Reviews in Medical Education (2022)Systematic Reviews in Medical…Social media in undergraduate medical education: A systematic review (2021)Social media in undergraduate…Parental bereavement – impact of death of neonates and children under 12 years on personhood of parents: a systematic scoping review (2021)Parental bereavement – impact…Assessing mentoring: A scoping review of mentoring assessment tools in internal medicine between 1990 and 2019 (2020)Assessing mentoring: A scopin…Tips for Improving the Writing and Reporting Quality of Systematic, Scoping, and Narrative Reviews (2019)Tips for Improving the Writin…Enhancing mentoring experiences through e-mentoring: a systematic scoping review of e-mentoring programs between 2000 and 2017 (2019)Enhancing mentoring experienc…Educational roles as a continuum of mentoring’s role in medicine – a systematic review and thematic analysis of educational studies from 2000 to 2018 (2019)Educational roles as a contin…A Best Evidence in Medical Education systematic review to determine the most effective teaching methods that develop reflection in medical students: BEME Guide No. 51 (2019)A Best Evidence in Medical Ed…Systematic review of interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine (2018)Systematic review of interven…Knowledge Synthesis (2018)Knowledge SynthesisA scoping review of mentor training programs in medicine between 1990 and 2017 (2018)A scoping review of mentor tr…CAEP 2016 Academic Symposium: A Writer’s Guide to Key Steps in Producing Quality Education Scholarship (2017)CAEP 2016 Academic Symposium:…Beyond synthesis: augmenting systematic review procedures with practical principles to optimise impact and uptake in educational policy and practice (2016)Beyond synthesis: augmenting …Are we talking the same paradigm? Considering methodological choices in health education systematic review (2016)Are we talking the same parad…Systematic reviews in medical education: A practical approach: AMEE Guide 94 (2014)Systematic reviews in medical…Challenges of synthesizing medical education research (2014)Challenges of synthesizing me…Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Developing a teacher identity in the university context: a systematic review of the literature (2016)A methodological systematic review of meta-ethnography conduct to articulate the complex analytical phases (2019)Meta-ethnography in healthcare research: a guide to using a meta-ethnographic approach for literature synthesis (2021)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (2004)The Number, Quality, and Coverage of Randomized Controlled Trials in Nephrology (2004)The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study (2009)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Modified Delphi Study (2016)Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions (2017)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data (2015)Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis (2019)Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies (2004)A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling: Effectiveness and Moderating Variables (2008)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation (2015)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2010Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting1,701 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses1,374 cited
  • 2002Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality397 cited
  • 2013Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials374 cited
  • 1999Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.368 cited
  • 2013Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education356 cited
  • 2007Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: a guide to methods338 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Social media in undergraduate medical education: A systematic review128 cited
  • 2019A Best Evidence in Medical Education systematic review to determine the most effective teaching methods that develop reflection in medical students: BEME Guide No. 51

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

104 cited
  • 2020Assessing mentoring: A scoping review of mentoring assessment tools in internal medicine between 1990 and 2019101 cited
  • 2014Systematic reviews in medical education: A practical approach: AMEE Guide 94100 cited
  • 2018A scoping review of mentor training programs in medicine between 1990 and 201792 cited
  • 2019Enhancing mentoring experiences through e-mentoring: a systematic scoping review of e-mentoring programs between 2000 and 201789 cited
  • 2019Tips for Improving the Writing and Reporting Quality of Systematic, Scoping, and Narrative Reviews80 cited
  • 2019Educational roles as a continuum of mentoring’s role in medicine – a systematic review and thematic analysis of educational studies from 2000 to 201866 cited
  • 2021Parental bereavement – impact of death of neonates and children under 12 years on personhood of parents: a systematic scoping review58 cited
  • 2016Are we talking the same paradigm? Considering methodological choices in health education systematic review37 cited
  • 2022Systematic Reviews in Medical Education14 cited
  • 2018Systematic review of interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine13 cited
  • 2017CAEP 2016 Academic Symposium: A Writer’s Guide to Key Steps in Producing Quality Education Scholarship11 cited
  • 2016Beyond synthesis: augmenting systematic review procedures with practical principles to optimise impact and uptake in educational policy and practice11 cited
  • 2014Challenges of synthesizing medical education research10 cited
  • 2018Knowledge Synthesis8 cited