Screening for Speech and Language Disorders: the reliability, validity and accuracy of the General Language Screen

Carol Stott · Melanie J. Merricks · Patrick Bolton · Ian Michael Goodyer

42 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Language & Communication Disorders

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Language Development and Disorders Voice and Speech Disorders Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Abstract

This paper reports the reliability, validity and accuracy of the General Language Screen (GLS) as the first stage in its development as a potential screening instrument for the identification of speech and language disorder (SLD) in the primary care setting. Data reported were obtained during the Cambridge Language and Speech Project (CLASP) a longitudinal epidemiological study of primary SLD. The GLS was originally used in initial CLASP sample ascertainment when children were aged 36 months. This report utilises speech and language data collected at subsequent stages of this study (37-months, 45-months and 8-years) to determine the reliability, validity and accuracy of the GLS. The GLS demonstrated sufficient levels of reliability (internal consistency alpha = 0.74) and validity (criterion validity r = -0.55). Adequate construct validity was demonstrated by a factor analysis in which two language related factors were identified. These data therefore justified exploration of the accuracy of the GLS as a screening instrument. Analysis of accuracy in this context is complicated by lack of a generally accepted method of defining SLD case status. This report utilises data on language function at different stages of development to provide measures of GLS accuracy over time. Concurrent accuracy, measured against parental report of language function at 37-months, was good (ROC area under the curve = 0.93). Predictive accuracy measured against direct assessment of speech and language at 45-months and 8-years was, as expected, somewhat less (ROC = 0.77 and 0.68 respectively). The implications for the use of the GLS as a screening instrument are discussed. The data indicate that the GLS would function most usefully as the first stage of a two-stage screen for SLD in the primary care setting. Recommendations are made as to the nature of the second stage of such a screen and plans for future research are outlined.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 42 citations exist upstream.

References

2014Essentials of Psychological Testing 1998Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature.1983DEVELOPMENTAL LANGUAGE DELAY FROM THREE TO SEVEN YEARS AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR LOW INTELLIGENCE AND READING DIFFICULTIES AT AGE SEVEN 2001The Developmental Profile 1979Speech retarded and deaf children : their psychological development 1978Behavior, language, and development in three-year-old children 1998Comparisons of children with delayed and normal language at 24 months of age on measures of behavioral difficulties, social and cognitive development 1982Validation of an Early Language Milestone Scale in a High-Risk Population

Cited by

2006Studie naar de wenselijkheid en haalbaarheid van de invoering van centrale taaltoetsen in Vlaanderen in functie van gelijke onderwijskansen

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.