SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Problems With the Argument From Fine Tuning · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleProblems With the Argument From Fine Tuning

Mark Colyvan2005

Article2005

Problems With the Argument From Fine Tuning

Mark Colyvan · Jay L. Garfield · Graham Priest

91 citations·0/0 files stored·Synthese

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Study and Philosophy of Religion Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Theology and Philosophy of Evil

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 91 citations exist upstream.

References

1965THE EXISTENCE OF GOD 2000Fine‐Tuning and Multiple Universes 2000Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science and Theology 2001Probabilities and the Fine-Tuning Argument: a Sceptical View 1987The Inverse Gambler's Fallacy: the Argument from Design. The Anthropic Principle Applied to Wheeler Universes 2004THE DESIGN ARGUMENT 1986One World – The Interaction of Science and Theology 1986One World: The Interaction of Science and Theology

Cited by

2010The evidence for God: religious knowledge reexamined 2012Four Problems About Self-Locating Belief 2019A Reasonable Little Question: A Formulation of the Fine-Tuning Argument 2006God, Fine-Tuning, and the Problem of Old Evidence 2009MULTIPLE UNIVERSES AND OBSERVATION SELECTION EFFECTS 2017Fine-tuning in the context of Bayesian theory testing 2010

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2004THE DESIGN ARGUMENTbook · 4 shared references 2023Why? The Purpose of the Universebook · 3 shared references 2007PROBABILISTIC ARGUMENTS FOR MULTIPLE UNIVERSESarticle · 3 shared references 2018Did the universe design itself?article · 3 shared references 2012Four Problems About Self-Locating Beliefarticle · 3 shared references 2022Multiple Universes and Self-Locating Evidencearticle · 3 shared references

Details

Year2005

Typearticle

Published2005-07-01

VenueSynthese

ISSN-L0039-7857

Languageen

Citations91

Files0 public / 0

ShelfStudy and Philosophy of Religion

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s11229-005-6195-0

openalex_workW2104677740

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

Analogical Thinking in Ecology: Looking beyond Disciplinary Boundaries

2020Using statistical methods to model the fine-tuning of molecular machines and systems