SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic reviews of published evidence: Miracles or minefields?
16 references·2 citing·37 second hop
Systematic reviews of published evidence: Miracles or minefields? (1998)Systematic reviews of published evidence:…Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Summing up evidence: one answ…How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) (1997)How to read a paper: Papers t…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data (1995)Practical methodology of meta…Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1994)Users' Guides to the Medical …Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Systematic Review: Why source…Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests (1994)Guidelines for Meta-analyses …Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Review papers : The statistic…A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)A comparison of results of me…Can meta-analyses be trusted? (1991)Can meta-analyses be trusted?The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…A systematic review of analytical methods used to study subgroups in (individual patient data) meta-analyses (2007)A systematic review of analyt…What Randomized Trials and Systematic Reviews Can Offer Decision Makers (1999)What Randomized Trials and Sy…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Socioeconomic Inequalities in Depression: A Meta-Analysis (2003)Long-term mental health of war-refugees: a systematic literature review (2015)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Affective Disorders and Suicide Risk: A Reexamination (2000)The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in COVID‐19 patients: a meta‐analysis (2020)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,677 cited
  • 1992A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction1,517 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 1993Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis1,284 cited
  • 1994Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated1,016 cited
  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 1994Users' Guides to the Medical Literature813 cited
  • 1994Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests754 cited
  • 1998Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough655 cited
  • 1997How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses)575 cited
  • 1995

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data
492 cited
  • 1991Can meta-analyses be trusted?489 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2007A systematic review of analytical methods used to study subgroups in (individual patient data) meta-analyses31 cited
    • 1999What Randomized Trials and Systematic Reviews Can Offer Decision Makers16 cited