Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of Practice

Mark P. A. Thompson

378 citations0/0 files storedOrganization Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovative Education and Learning Practices Knowledge Management and Sharing Organizational Learning and Leadership

Abstract

If communities of practice (Lave and Wenger 1991) are best understood as fluid social relations, enacted among a self-selected group of participants, then are they best left alone, free from “interference” by organizational managers and policymakers? Or are there ways in which organizations can provide helpful support to such communities, without constraining the delicate dynamic by which they are sustained? This paper supports the latter position, arguing that organizations should sponsor the creation of certain loose organizational structures, around which it is hoped that communities of practice may then interact. However, some recent empirical research is presented suggesting that attempts to control group interaction by introducing too much structure are likely to result in the demise of the community itself. It is therefore proposed that there are lower and upper parameters for structural intervention in communities of practice. It is suggested that such communities also have epistemic parameters, where participants’ willingness to express their ideas as conceptual boundary objects around which others may engage and develop ideas is a minimum requirement, but where too much inward communicative focus is likely to result in gradual loss of meaning, with a negative effect on the community. In developing this position, this paper attempts to deepen our theoretical understanding of the interrelationship between organizational structure and the epistemic activity of members of communities of practice. Several practical implications of these insights are discussed for organizations wishing to cultivate and maintain communities of practice within their own working environments.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 378 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.1991Situated Learning 1999Communities of practice learning, meaning, and identity 1998Communities of Practice 1984The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration 1954Philosophical Investigations.1991Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation 1992Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms

Cited by

2010Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions 2006Limits to Communities of Practice 2007Knowledge-Based Innovation: Emergence and Embedding of New Practice Areas in Management Consulting Firms 2019Working for an Algorithm: Power Asymmetries and Agency in Online Work Settings 2008Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail 2018Social media information benefits, knowledge management and smart organizations

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.